i.mx53 HABv4

alexeym — Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:00:30 GMT

Strange things happening to me while trying to get HAB working on mx53loco board.

I couldn't find any ready-made tutorials for mx53 boards. So I used https://boundarydevices.com/high-assurance-boot-hab-dummies/ as fulcrum.

What I did:

0. I followed HAB for dummies manual till step 2(Flashing the keys) as SRK_HASH differs from imx6 imx5 I generated fuse prog sequence by hand using SRK_1_2_3_4_fuse.bin(attached)

fuse prog -y 1 0x1 0x5a;
fuse prog -y 3 0x1 0x71;
fuse prog -y 3 0x2 0x26;
fuse prog -y 3 0x3 0x4;
fuse prog -y 3 0x4 0x22;
fuse prog -y 3 0x5 0x40;
fuse prog -y 3 0x6 0xf;
fuse prog -y 3 0x7 0x26;
fuse prog -y 3 0x8 0x49;
fuse prog -y 3 0x9 0xa2;
fuse prog -y 3 0xa 0x74;
fuse prog -y 3 0xb 0x29;
fuse prog -y 3 0xc 0xc2;
fuse prog -y 3 0xd 0xe8;
fuse prog -y 3 0xe 0x97;
fuse prog -y 3 0xf 0x64;
fuse prog -y 3 0x10 0xeb;
fuse prog -y 3 0x11 0xb6;
fuse prog -y 3 0x12 0xb6;
fuse prog -y 3 0x13 0xc7;
fuse prog -y 3 0x14 0x43;
fuse prog -y 3 0x15 0x8;
fuse prog -y 3 0x16 0x2f;
fuse prog -y 3 0x17 0x56;
fuse prog -y 3 0x18 0x8e;
fuse prog -y 3 0x19 0x77;
fuse prog -y 3 0x1a 0x18;
fuse prog -y 3 0x1b 0x93;
fuse prog -y 3 0x1c 0xd7;
fuse prog -y 3 0x1d 0xd5;
fuse prog -y 3 0x1e 0xdf;
fuse prog -y 3 0x1f 0x43;

1. I took mainline u-boot (tag v2020.10)

2. patched it to support secure boot on mx53loco. (patch attached)

3. add to config:

CONFIG_CMD_FUSE=y
CONFIG_IMX_HAB=y

4. make V=1 gives me output

Image Type: Freescale IMX Boot Image
Image Ver: 2 (i.MX53/6/7 compatible)
Mode: DCD
Data Size: 421984 Bytes = 412.09 KiB = 0.40 MiB
Load Address: 777ff420
Entry Point: 77800000
HAB Blocks: 0x777ff400 0x00000000 0x00064c00
DCD Blocks: 0x00910000 0x0000002c 0x000001a8

5. used attached u-boot.csf to make u-boot_csf.bin

./cst --o u-boot_csf.bin --i u-boot.csf
cat u-boot.imx u-boot_csf.bin > u-boot_signed.imx
sudo dd if=u-boot_signed.imx of=$DISK seek=2 bs=512

6. now where I am:

board starting, but hab_status command returns:

Secure boot disabled

HAB Configuration: 0xf0, HAB State: 0x66

--------- HAB Event 1 -----------------
event data:
0xdb 0x00 0x14 0x40 0x33 0x2d 0xc0 0x00
0xbe 0x00 0x0c 0x02 0x09 0x00 0x00 0x01
0x00 0x00 0x08 0x88

STS = HAB_FAILURE (0x33)
RSN = HAB_OVR_STORAGE (0x2D)
CTX = HAB_CTX_COMMAND (0xC0)
ENG = HAB_ENG_ANY (0x00)

--------- HAB Event 2 -----------------
event data:
0xdb 0x00 0x14 0x40 0x33 0x0c 0xa0 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x77 0x7f 0xf4 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x20

STS = HAB_FAILURE (0x33)
RSN = HAB_INV_ASSERTION (0x0C)
CTX = HAB_CTX_ASSERT (0xA0)
ENG = HAB_ENG_ANY (0x00)

--------- HAB Event 3 -----------------
event data:
0xdb 0x00 0x14 0x40 0x33 0x0c 0xa0 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x77 0x7f 0xf4 0x2c
0x00 0x00 0x01 0xa8

STS = HAB_FAILURE (0x33)
RSN = HAB_INV_ASSERTION (0x0C)
CTX = HAB_CTX_ASSERT (0xA0)
ENG = HAB_ENG_ANY (0x00)

--------- HAB Event 4 -----------------
event data:
0xdb 0x00 0x14 0x40 0x33 0x0c 0xa0 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x77 0x7f 0xf4 0x20
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01

STS = HAB_FAILURE (0x33)
RSN = HAB_INV_ASSERTION (0x0C)
CTX = HAB_CTX_ASSERT (0xA0)
ENG = HAB_ENG_ANY (0x00)

--------- HAB Event 5 -----------------
event data:
0xdb 0x00 0x14 0x40 0x33 0x0c 0xa0 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x77 0x80 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x04

STS = HAB_FAILURE (0x33)
RSN = HAB_INV_ASSERTION (0x0C)
CTX = HAB_CTX_ASSERT (0xA0)
ENG = HAB_ENG_ANY (0x00)

Please point me what am I doing wrong. I found only one topic with HAB_OVR_STORAGE event reason and it was mx28 board where somebody tried to use 4096 bit key where mx28 boards only support 2048 bit keys. But its not my case...

Re: HRe: i.mx53 HABv4

alexeym — Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:41:55 GMT

Thank you for reply!

I've done:
1. applied the same patch to imx_v2020.04_5.4.47_2.2.0 branch
2. signed/padded u-boot.imx with mk_secure_uboot script from imx-test/test/mxc_secureboot/V2012/u-boot/ and I still have the same result.

Maybe something with CST version, or key length?
I see that example scripts using slightly different syntax for cst tool, and for some reason all keys are 2048 lenghs.

Re: i.mx53 HABv4

alexeym — Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:34:18 GMT

Changing key length to 2048 fixed the problem

i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: i.mx53 HABv4

i.mx53 HABv4

HRe: i.mx53 HABv4

Re: HRe: i.mx53 HABv4

Re: i.mx53 HABv4