<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX Processors中的主题 This an automatic process.  We are marking this post as s...</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/HABv4-1-vs-TPM1-2/m-p/1136823#M161178</link>
    <description>&lt;B&gt;This an automatic process.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
We are marking this post as solved, due to the either low activity or any reply marked as correct.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
If you have additional questions, please create a new post and reference to this closed post.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
NXP Community!</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CommunityBot</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-03T16:25:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HABv4.1 vs. TPM1.2</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/HABv4-1-vs-TPM1-2/m-p/388981#M56534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering how the HABv4.1 function of the Security Engine in the iMX6 compares to the TPM1.2 (Trusted Platform Module) standard. Does implementing the HAB functionality of the iMX6 meet the TPM1.2 standard?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:26:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/HABv4-1-vs-TPM1-2/m-p/388981#M56534</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-20T14:26:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HABv4.1 vs. TPM1.2</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/HABv4-1-vs-TPM1-2/m-p/388982#M56535</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;&amp;nbsp; Strictly speaking, the HAB technology is not intended to meet the TPM1.2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;High Assurance Boot (HAB) is just Freescale’s implementation for secure boot.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/HABv4-1-vs-TPM1-2/m-p/388982#M56535</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-24T11:30:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This an automatic process.  We are marking this post as s...</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/HABv4-1-vs-TPM1-2/m-p/1136823#M161178</link>
      <description>&lt;B&gt;This an automatic process.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
We are marking this post as solved, due to the either low activity or any reply marked as correct.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
If you have additional questions, please create a new post and reference to this closed post.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
NXP Community!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/HABv4-1-vs-TPM1-2/m-p/1136823#M161178</guid>
      <dc:creator>CommunityBot</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-03T16:25:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

