<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IMX8QM Inconsistent shareability domain on tlbi instructions in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8QM-Inconsistent-shareability-domain-on-tlbi-instructions/m-p/1075212#M157829</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 1rem;"&gt;I'm using a IMX8QM system which features a dual-core A72 cluster plus a quad-core A53 cluster. Running on EL2 from one of the A53 cores I want to unmap a single page for all cores, so after I remove the entry for the page table I use the tlb invalidation instructions accompanied by the usual synchronization instructions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 1.5em 0px 1rem;"&gt;If I execute a "tlbi alle2is" instruction all goes fine. The translation is invalidated for all cores. However, if I use "tlbi vae2is" the cached TLB entries are invalidated only for the A53 cluster. If I execute it from one of the A72 cores everything goes fine again, every core sees the entry invalidated. In all cases, if I remove the "is"&amp;nbsp;part of the instruction only the core where its executing has the pte invalidated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 1.5em 0px 1rem;"&gt;I have a synchronization barrier that guarantees the A72 cores do not use that address until well after the invalidation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 1.5em 0px 0px;"&gt;What can I be doing wrong here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>josemartins90</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-07T14:56:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IMX8QM Inconsistent shareability domain on tlbi instructions</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8QM-Inconsistent-shareability-domain-on-tlbi-instructions/m-p/1075212#M157829</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 1rem;"&gt;I'm using a IMX8QM system which features a dual-core A72 cluster plus a quad-core A53 cluster. Running on EL2 from one of the A53 cores I want to unmap a single page for all cores, so after I remove the entry for the page table I use the tlb invalidation instructions accompanied by the usual synchronization instructions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 1.5em 0px 1rem;"&gt;If I execute a "tlbi alle2is" instruction all goes fine. The translation is invalidated for all cores. However, if I use "tlbi vae2is" the cached TLB entries are invalidated only for the A53 cluster. If I execute it from one of the A72 cores everything goes fine again, every core sees the entry invalidated. In all cases, if I remove the "is"&amp;nbsp;part of the instruction only the core where its executing has the pte invalidated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 1.5em 0px 1rem;"&gt;I have a synchronization barrier that guarantees the A72 cores do not use that address until well after the invalidation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #333e48; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 20px; margin: 1.5em 0px 0px;"&gt;What can I be doing wrong here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8QM-Inconsistent-shareability-domain-on-tlbi-instructions/m-p/1075212#M157829</guid>
      <dc:creator>josemartins90</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-07T14:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX8QM Inconsistent shareability domain on tlbi instructions</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8QM-Inconsistent-shareability-domain-on-tlbi-instructions/m-p/1075213#M157830</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;josemartins90&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;issue may be related to cache erratum&amp;nbsp;ERR050104 described in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX8_1N94W.pdf" style="color: #215bd6; background-color: #ffffff; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14px;" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mask Set Errata for Mask 1N94W&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 13:31:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8QM-Inconsistent-shareability-domain-on-tlbi-instructions/m-p/1075213#M157830</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-08T13:31:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX8QM Inconsistent shareability domain on tlbi instructions</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8QM-Inconsistent-shareability-domain-on-tlbi-instructions/m-p/1075214#M157831</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It checks out. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 13:40:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8QM-Inconsistent-shareability-domain-on-tlbi-instructions/m-p/1075214#M157831</guid>
      <dc:creator>josemartins90</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-08T13:40:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

