<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: imx6 v4l2 4 channels tests in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6-v4l2-4-channels-tests/m-p/1019962#M150827</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Laurent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;i would like to know if it is better using v4l2, or direct using ipu driver (is there better&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;performance using ipu directly, or through v4l2)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;seems using ipu directly better performance may be obtained.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;Is the mxc_v4l_tvin application test stored on a git repo somewhere?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;one can look on &lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-test/tree/test/mxc_v4l2_test/mxc_v4l2_tvin.c?h=imx_4.14.98_2.3.0" title="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-test/tree/test/mxc_v4l2_test/mxc_v4l2_tvin.c?h=imx_4.14.98_2.3.0"&gt;mxc_v4l2_tvin.c\mxc_v4l2_test\test - imx-test - i.MX Driver Test Application Software&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-31T00:07:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>imx6 v4l2 4 channels tests</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6-v4l2-4-channels-tests/m-p/1019961#M150826</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on our project, we have a 4.19.35 kernel, based on meta-fsl-bsp-release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have an video decoder isl79987 with 4 analogic camera.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have applied the patch from this url:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/docs/DOC-158531"&gt;iMX6DQ ISL79985/79987 MIPI CSI2 CVBS camera surround view solution for Linux BSP&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and we use mxc_v4l_tvin.out test application.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything works well, we are able to display 4 camera stream on a hdmi screen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our question is related to the test application.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indeed, we see that in this application, direct access is done to the ipu driver, but when we look at the imx-test mxc_v4l2_capture.c (here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-test/tree/test/mxc_ipudev_test/mxc_ipudev_test.c?h=imx_4.19.35_1.1.0" title="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-test/tree/test/mxc_ipudev_test/mxc_ipudev_test.c?h=imx_4.19.35_1.1.0"&gt;mxc_ipudev_test.c\mxc_ipudev_test\test - imx-test - i.MX Driver Test Application Software&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we see that everything use the v4l2 framework.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So i would like to know if it is better using v4l2, or direct using ipu driver (is there better performance using ipu directly, or through v4l2)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the mxc_v4l_tvin application test stored on a git repo somewhere?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Laurent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 08:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6-v4l2-4-channels-tests/m-p/1019961#M150826</guid>
      <dc:creator>vaudoitlaurent</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-30T08:54:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx6 v4l2 4 channels tests</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6-v4l2-4-channels-tests/m-p/1019962#M150827</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Laurent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;i would like to know if it is better using v4l2, or direct using ipu driver (is there better&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;performance using ipu directly, or through v4l2)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;seems using ipu directly better performance may be obtained.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;Is the mxc_v4l_tvin application test stored on a git repo somewhere?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;one can look on &lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-test/tree/test/mxc_v4l2_test/mxc_v4l2_tvin.c?h=imx_4.14.98_2.3.0" title="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-test/tree/test/mxc_v4l2_test/mxc_v4l2_tvin.c?h=imx_4.14.98_2.3.0"&gt;mxc_v4l2_tvin.c\mxc_v4l2_test\test - imx-test - i.MX Driver Test Application Software&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6-v4l2-4-channels-tests/m-p/1019962#M150827</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-31T00:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx6 v4l2 4 channels tests</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6-v4l2-4-channels-tests/m-p/1019963#M150828</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we will keep this in mind&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Laurent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6-v4l2-4-channels-tests/m-p/1019963#M150828</guid>
      <dc:creator>vaudoitlaurent</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-31T10:15:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

