<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MU kernel module / M4 core communication in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/MU-kernel-module-M4-core-communication/m-p/1005547#M149004</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ran across this patch + demo that exposes&amp;nbsp;four MU's in linux (/dev/mu1) that opens a communication bridge to the M4 core (in the example, running Zephyr)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imxsupport/imx-mu/commit/" title="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imxsupport/imx-mu/commit/"&gt;imx-mu - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone here with expertise around the MessageUnit and performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would like to understand what would be a reasonable max throughput to/from the A53 and the M4 or vice versa.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dav1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-09T16:25:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MU kernel module / M4 core communication</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/MU-kernel-module-M4-core-communication/m-p/1005547#M149004</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ran across this patch + demo that exposes&amp;nbsp;four MU's in linux (/dev/mu1) that opens a communication bridge to the M4 core (in the example, running Zephyr)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imxsupport/imx-mu/commit/" title="https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imxsupport/imx-mu/commit/"&gt;imx-mu - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone here with expertise around the MessageUnit and performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would like to understand what would be a reasonable max throughput to/from the A53 and the M4 or vice versa.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/MU-kernel-module-M4-core-communication/m-p/1005547#M149004</guid>
      <dc:creator>dav1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-09T16:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MU kernel module / M4 core communication</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/MU-kernel-module-M4-core-communication/m-p/1005548#M149005</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Usually MU is not used to send data directly, but just the notification.&lt;BR /&gt;In our current Linux BSP, the MU is used for RPMSG.&lt;BR /&gt;The data exchange happens in the shared DDR memory which is reseved for RPMSG &lt;BR /&gt;and MU is used to send notice from one processor to another about when to access the memory and get the data.&lt;BR /&gt;Therefore it's hard to evaluated the performance of MU alone since it's just a messenger.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/MU-kernel-module-M4-core-communication/m-p/1005548#M149005</guid>
      <dc:creator>b36401</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-17T09:36:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

