<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RPMsg bypass in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/RPMsg-bypass/m-p/979832#M145687</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>greg_edwards</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-16T12:56:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RPMsg bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/RPMsg-bypass/m-p/979830#M145685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the imx8mm is it possible to use shared memory between the A53s (Linux) and M4 (RTOS) without going through RPMsg?&amp;nbsp; I don't see any notes stating that it's not possible, but also no examples of doing it without RPMsg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:08:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/RPMsg-bypass/m-p/979830#M145685</guid>
      <dc:creator>greg_edwards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-13T20:08:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPMsg bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/RPMsg-bypass/m-p/979831#M145686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/greg.edwards@harman.com"&gt;greg.edwards@harman.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can implement the shared memory between A53 and M4 on your own by&amp;nbsp;sharing the DDR between them. However, RPMSG does the same. So, I would suggest rather than implementing it, you use the supported RPMSG.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kunal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 07:21:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/RPMsg-bypass/m-p/979831#M145686</guid>
      <dc:creator>kunalkotecha1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-16T07:21:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RPMsg bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/RPMsg-bypass/m-p/979832#M145687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/RPMsg-bypass/m-p/979832#M145687</guid>
      <dc:creator>greg_edwards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-16T12:56:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

