<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Linux Binary Demo Files 2011.03 Release (L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE).  How to get &amp;quot;rootfs&amp;quot; Flashed. in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152436#M1431</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is an errata in the first silicon which prevents the graphics from VPU operating at 1080p at the original spec voltage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fix for this is to raise the supply voltage for this domain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Freescale are intentionally running T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The main reason the board runs hot is because we are intentionally running our T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V). While we are switching to T2.1 silicon beginning with the next production run, the software patch that sets VCC = 1.35V will remain in the Linux build for the foreseeable future. That means that Quick Start boards with T2.1 silicon will continue to run hot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Linux team is aware that they need to take the patch out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If people are really concerned about the board running hot, they can make a modification in the U-BOOT code that will make it run cooler, at the expense of exposing the T2.0 VPU bug a little more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In U-Boot, they can type the following (similar to the instruction on making video output changes):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;setenv bootcmd ‘i2c mw 0x48 0x2f 0x60; i2c mw 0x48 0x3c 0x62;run bootcmd_mmc’&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;saveenv&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What this change does is make the very first two commands that U-BOOT issues at boot are commands to the PMIC (0x48) to write (mw) to the VCC voltage set register (0x2f) a new voltage value of 1.3V (0x60) and then to the PMIC Supply register (0x3c) a command to ramp (0x62) to the new voltage value. Then the boot sequence will continue with the normal rest of the sequence (run bootcmd_mmc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then the users can make their own judgment on whether the board is running hot because of the increased VCC supply rail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While we are switching to T2.1 silicon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been told that the errata fix accouts for the increased temperature of the chip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QS boards that ship in May should have the new silicon on them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE cite="http://imxcommunity.org/forum/topics/linux-binary-demo-files-201103?groupUrl=imx53quickstartboard&amp;amp;#4103961Comment11704"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;- For the moment, I am more concerned with the processor that get&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; really hot after some minutes of operation.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Some users say that it is due to the R199 bug.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure of&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; that.&amp;nbsp; But, since I have not patched yet the R199 bug on my&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; board, I can not get fixed on that yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 17:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iafg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-02T17:01:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linux Binary Demo Files 2011.03 Release (L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE).  How to get "rootfs" Flashed.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152432#M1427</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Have anyone tried to Flash the new L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE on&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; an i.MX53 QSB.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- I am stuck on extracting files from "rootfs" file.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; The problem is that this BSP do not have a single "rootfs.tar.bz2"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; file, as in the L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1101_IMAGE, but 2 "rootfs" files.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; The 2 files are:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; rootfs.ext2.gz&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; rootfs.jffs2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; The above 2 files are really smaller than the previous&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; "rootfs.tar.bz2", and seems to not be a "tar" archive.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Claude&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:19:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152432#M1427</guid>
      <dc:creator>Claude_Sylvain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-23T15:19:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux Binary Demo Files 2011.03 Release (L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE).  How to get "rootfs" Flashed.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152433#M1428</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not exactly, but I found lucid_1108.tar.gz on the Freescale website&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=IMX53QSB&amp;amp;fpsp=1&amp;amp;tab=Design_Tools_Tab" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=IMX5...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and tried that.&amp;nbsp; Click on UBUNTU_RFS_DEMOIMG_1101. The video acceleration did not work at all so I went back to 10.04.&amp;nbsp; If you want to try that "ER_1103" file, and have access to a Linux machine, you can gunzip rootfs.ext2.gz and then mount it with the loop device.&amp;nbsp; From there you can copy the files or make your own tarball.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mkdir somedir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sudo mount -o loop rootfs.ext2 somedir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not using the microsd for a file system.&amp;nbsp; It is too slow for me to stand.&amp;nbsp; I wonder if this is normal...&amp;nbsp; A USB harddrive is better and SATA is working better still.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152433#M1428</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterNewton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-23T16:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux Binary Demo Files 2011.03 Release (L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE).  How to get "rootfs" Flashed.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152434#M1429</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Peter Newton said:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; Not exactly, but I found lucid_1108.tar.gz on the Freescale website&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=IMX5" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=IMX5&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; and tried that.&amp;nbsp; Click on UBUNTU_RFS_DEMOIMG_1101. The video acceleration&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; did not work at all so I went back to 10.04.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have not tried that one.&amp;nbsp; Maybe I will try it later.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; If you want to try that "ER_1103" file, and have access to a Linux&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; machine, you can gunzip rootfs.ext2.gz and then mount it with the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; loop device.&amp;nbsp; From there you can copy the files or make your own tarball.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; mkdir somedir&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; sudo mount -o loop rootfs.ext2 somedir&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Thank a lot.&amp;nbsp; I can now have access to files in "rootfs.ext2".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- However, when I boot the i.MX53 QSB using the 11.03 BSP,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; there is some errors, and a segmentation fault.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; The display can not be opened.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; Le login prompt display "freescale" instead of "lucid", and&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; the password "lucid" do not work anymore.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; What is the password for that BSP...&amp;nbsp; There is no documentation&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; included in the BSP image :-(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Below, a part of what is displayed in the remote serial console:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; +++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;starting pid 2202, tty '': '/sbin/getty -L ttymxc0 115200 vt100'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;_XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;_XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/freescale:0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;_XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(EE) XKB: Couldn't open rules file /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Backtrace (0 deep):&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fatal server error:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Segmentation fault caught&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can't deallocate console 2 Device or resource busy&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc (4.4.4_09.06.2010) 4.4.4&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;root filesystem built on Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:24:50 -0500&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;freescale login: matchbox-panel: failed to open displaymatchbox-desktop: unable&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to open display !&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;matchbox: can't open display! check your DISPLAY variable.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ts_open: No such file or directory&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; +++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; I am not using the microsd for a file system.&amp;nbsp; It is too slow for&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; me to stand.&amp;nbsp; I wonder if this is normal...&amp;nbsp; A USB harddrive is better&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; and SATA is working better still.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Interesting, I have not noticed this SD Card slowness.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- For the moment, I am more concerned with the processor that get&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; really hot after some minutes of operation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; Some users say that it is due to the R199 bug.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure of&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; that.&amp;nbsp; But, since I have not patched yet the R199 bug on my&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; board, I can not get fixed on that yet.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Also, 2 annoying things I noticed:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - There is a current leak between the VGA monitor and the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; i.MX53 QSB, that make the i.MX53 QSB partially powered&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; from the RGB monitor when the i.MX53 QSB 5V plug is removed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - When connecting a powered USB HUB to the i.MX53 QSB,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; that USB HUB become a power source that make the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; i.MX53 QSB stay powered, even if the 5V power plug is&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; removed from the board :-/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks a lot, again.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Claude&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152434#M1429</guid>
      <dc:creator>Claude_Sylvain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-23T18:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux Binary Demo Files 2011.03 Release (L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE).  How to get "rootfs" Flashed.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152435#M1430</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;SD Cards do come in different "speeds" or "speed grades"... does this account for the slowness you saw?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE cite="http://imxcommunity.org/forum/topics/linux-binary-demo-files-201103?groupUrl=imx53quickstartboard&amp;amp;#4103961Comment11704"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;gt; I am not using the microsd for a file system.&amp;nbsp; It is too slow for&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; me to stand.&amp;nbsp; I wonder if this is normal...&amp;nbsp; A USB harddrive is better&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; and SATA is working better still.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interesting, I have not noticed this SD Card slowness.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152435#M1430</guid>
      <dc:creator>iafg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-02T16:51:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux Binary Demo Files 2011.03 Release (L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE).  How to get "rootfs" Flashed.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152436#M1431</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is an errata in the first silicon which prevents the graphics from VPU operating at 1080p at the original spec voltage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fix for this is to raise the supply voltage for this domain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Freescale are intentionally running T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The main reason the board runs hot is because we are intentionally running our T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V). While we are switching to T2.1 silicon beginning with the next production run, the software patch that sets VCC = 1.35V will remain in the Linux build for the foreseeable future. That means that Quick Start boards with T2.1 silicon will continue to run hot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Linux team is aware that they need to take the patch out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If people are really concerned about the board running hot, they can make a modification in the U-BOOT code that will make it run cooler, at the expense of exposing the T2.0 VPU bug a little more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In U-Boot, they can type the following (similar to the instruction on making video output changes):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;setenv bootcmd ‘i2c mw 0x48 0x2f 0x60; i2c mw 0x48 0x3c 0x62;run bootcmd_mmc’&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;saveenv&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What this change does is make the very first two commands that U-BOOT issues at boot are commands to the PMIC (0x48) to write (mw) to the VCC voltage set register (0x2f) a new voltage value of 1.3V (0x60) and then to the PMIC Supply register (0x3c) a command to ramp (0x62) to the new voltage value. Then the boot sequence will continue with the normal rest of the sequence (run bootcmd_mmc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then the users can make their own judgment on whether the board is running hot because of the increased VCC supply rail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While we are switching to T2.1 silicon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been told that the errata fix accouts for the increased temperature of the chip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QS boards that ship in May should have the new silicon on them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE cite="http://imxcommunity.org/forum/topics/linux-binary-demo-files-201103?groupUrl=imx53quickstartboard&amp;amp;#4103961Comment11704"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;- For the moment, I am more concerned with the processor that get&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; really hot after some minutes of operation.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Some users say that it is due to the R199 bug.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure of&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; that.&amp;nbsp; But, since I have not patched yet the R199 bug on my&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; board, I can not get fixed on that yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 17:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152436#M1431</guid>
      <dc:creator>iafg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-02T17:01:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux Binary Demo Files 2011.03 Release (L2.6.35_MX53_ER_1103_IMAGE).  How to get "rootfs" Flashed.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152437#M1432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the link to the errata:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/IMX53CE.pdf?fpsp=1&amp;amp;WT_TYPE=Errata&amp;amp;WT_VENDOR=FREESCALE&amp;amp;WT_FILE_FORMAT=pdf&amp;amp;WT_ASSET=Documentation" target="_blank"&gt;i.mx53 VPU errata&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/IMX53CE.pdf?fpsp=1&amp;amp;WT_TYPE=Errata&amp;amp;WT_VENDOR=FREESCALE&amp;amp;WT_FILE_FORMAT=pdf&amp;amp;WT_ASSET=Documentation" target="_blank"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/IMX53CE.pdf?fpsp=1&amp;amp;WT_TYPE=Errata&amp;amp;WT_VENDOR=FREESCALE&amp;amp;WT_FILE_FORMAT=pdf&amp;amp;WT_ASSET=Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/IMX53CE.pdf?fpsp=1&amp;amp;WT_TYPE=Errata&amp;amp;WT_VENDOR=FREESCALE&amp;amp;WT_FILE_FORMAT=pdf&amp;amp;WT_ASSET=Documentation" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;CITE&gt;Iain Galloway (Future) said:&lt;/CITE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE cite="http://imxcommunity.org/group/imx53quickstartboard/forum/comment/show?id=4103961%3AComment%3A12213&amp;amp;xn_out=json&amp;amp;firstPage=1&amp;amp;lastPage=1&amp;amp;_=1304355673373&amp;amp;xg_token=b892e2c331a2d1bae319547349df2125#4103961Comment12213"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is an errata in the first silicon which prevents the graphics from VPU operating at 1080p at the original spec voltage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fix for this is to raise the supply voltage for this domain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Freescale are intentionally running T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The main reason the board runs hot is because we are intentionally running our T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V). While we are switching to T2.1 silicon beginning with the next production run, the software patch that sets VCC = 1.35V will remain in the Linux build for the foreseeable future. That means that Quick Start boards with T2.1 silicon will continue to run hot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Linux team is aware that they need to take the patch out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If people are really concerned about the board running hot, they can make a modification in the U-BOOT code that will make it run cooler, at the expense of exposing the T2.0 VPU bug a little more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In U-Boot, they can type the following (similar to the instruction on making video output changes):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;setenv bootcmd ‘i2c mw 0x48 0x2f 0x60; i2c mw 0x48 0x3c 0x62;run bootcmd_mmc’&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;saveenv&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What this change does is make the very first two commands that U-BOOT issues at boot are commands to the PMIC (0x48) to write (mw) to the VCC voltage set register (0x2f) a new voltage value of 1.3V (0x60) and then to the PMIC Supply register (0x3c) a command to ramp (0x62) to the new voltage value. Then the boot sequence will continue with the normal rest of the sequence (run bootcmd_mmc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then the users can make their own judgment on whether the board is running hot because of the increased VCC supply rail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While we are switching to T2.1 silicon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been told that the errata fix accouts for the increased temperature of the chip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QS boards that ship in May should have the new silicon on them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE cite="http://imxcommunity.org/forum/topics/linux-binary-demo-files-201103?groupUrl=imx53quickstartboard&amp;amp;#4103961Comment11704"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;- For the moment, I am more concerned with the processor that get&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; really hot after some minutes of operation.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Some users say that it is due to the R199 bug.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure of&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; that.&amp;nbsp; But, since I have not patched yet the R199 bug on my&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; board, I can not get fixed on that yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 17:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-Binary-Demo-Files-2011-03-Release-L2-6-35-MX53-ER-1103/m-p/152437#M1432</guid>
      <dc:creator>iafg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-02T17:04:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

