<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IMX6D Poor Ethernet Performance (UDP) in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930582#M139604</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. There are some issues with iperf3. So you can use iperf2 instead of iperf3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 05:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>b36401</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-05T05:07:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IMX6D Poor Ethernet Performance (UDP)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930579#M139601</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using an IMX6D on a custom board,&amp;nbsp;running the 4.14.98 Linux Kernel released by NXP. The custom board also uses an AR8031 PHY, similar to the IMX6QSabreSD eval board.&amp;nbsp;I am seeing poor UDP performance, with lots of lost datagrams when testing with iperf3. Performance varies when testing against different machines running Windows/or Linux with Gigabit interfaces. But for the case when testing against the IMX6SabreSD board (which happens to be the &lt;STRONG&gt;BEST&lt;/STRONG&gt; case), &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;in an isolated network, UDP RX rates are between 285-300 Mbps with about 25% loss, and UDP TX rates top out at 160 Mbps with minimal datagram loss (&amp;lt;.5%). &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;I am aware of the ERRATA on the MAC block of the SOC (ERR004512), which essentially says that performance is limited to around 400 Mbps (TX + RX) combined. I am seeing this with TCP, as expected. However UDP is performing terribly. Any suggestions on how to increase UDP performance? At least enough to be in line with the ERRATA.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; "&gt;Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; "&gt;Neil&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 20:14:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930579#M139601</guid>
      <dc:creator>npatel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-15T20:14:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6D Poor Ethernet Performance (UDP)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930580#M139602</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please make sure that everything is fine with the connection on hardware level. I mean wires, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;Also please note that is is processor bus is loaded with some other task in addition to networkig it may cause loss also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:29:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930580#M139602</guid>
      <dc:creator>b36401</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-16T06:29:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6D Poor Ethernet Performance (UDP)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930581#M139603</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Victor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So this issue with poor UDP performance is Iperf3 related. Switching to Iperf2, and limiting the client UDP bandwidth so that it is inline with ERRATA ERR004512 ( -b 400M), UDP performance was as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930581#M139603</guid>
      <dc:creator>npatel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-28T16:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6D Poor Ethernet Performance (UDP)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930582#M139604</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. There are some issues with iperf3. So you can use iperf2 instead of iperf3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 05:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6D-Poor-Ethernet-Performance-UDP/m-p/930582#M139604</guid>
      <dc:creator>b36401</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-05T05:07:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

