<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sensor MMA8451 and Hardware Choice in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sensor-MMA8451-and-Hardware-Choice/m-p/851256#M130255</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Goodmornig,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an hardware question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using the sensor mma8451 with a datarate of 800Hz and a Raspberry Pi 2B with a quad-core&amp;nbsp; CPU 900MHz and RAM 1GB. Could be enough right? So why I don't have 800 samples every second? (I have only 200 samples per second)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it a bus problem? Should I use the 2 bus in parallel on the same sensor?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luigi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>luigi5hd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T14:57:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sensor MMA8451 and Hardware Choice</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sensor-MMA8451-and-Hardware-Choice/m-p/851256#M130255</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Goodmornig,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an hardware question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using the sensor mma8451 with a datarate of 800Hz and a Raspberry Pi 2B with a quad-core&amp;nbsp; CPU 900MHz and RAM 1GB. Could be enough right? So why I don't have 800 samples every second? (I have only 200 samples per second)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it a bus problem? Should I use the 2 bus in parallel on the same sensor?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luigi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sensor-MMA8451-and-Hardware-Choice/m-p/851256#M130255</guid>
      <dc:creator>luigi5hd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T14:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensor MMA8451 and Hardware Choice</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sensor-MMA8451-and-Hardware-Choice/m-p/851257#M130256</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Luigi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please try to be more specific with your question and the relation with i.MX processors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The MMA8451 is a NXP digital accelerometer that communicates with a host processor by I2C bus, so, you will need to ensure the I2C driver have enough &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;bandwidth&lt;/SPAN&gt; and/or speed transfer, and also, the I2C driver architecture (if using polling, checking the polling period, or if using interrupts, checking the interrupt priority/latency according with the Operating System running on the host processor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this will be useful for you.&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards!&lt;BR /&gt;/Carlos&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;BR /&gt;- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sensor-MMA8451-and-Hardware-Choice/m-p/851257#M130256</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarlosCasillas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T20:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

