<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IMX6Q Ethernet UDP Performance in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/798676#M123517</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Son&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please check below reports, in particular measurements dependancy of iperf version:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues/296" title="https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues/296"&gt;Extremely high packet loss with UDP test · Issue #296 · esnet/iperf · GitHub&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-19T23:12:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IMX6Q Ethernet UDP Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/798675#M123516</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two IMX6Q is connected through a gigabit switch and the following test was performed using iperf3&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE style="color: #484848; background-color: #fafafa; border: 1px solid #dadada; font-size: 12px; margin: 1em 1em 1em 1.6em; padding: 2px 2px 2px 0px;"&gt;Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Client:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;iperf3 -u -c 10.88.22.22 -b 1G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Connecting to host 10.88.22.22, port 5201&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] local 10.88.11.11 port 55031 connected to 10.88.22.22 port 5201&lt;BR /&gt;[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Total Datagrams&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 42.5 MBytes 357 Mbits/sec 30787 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 42.5 MBytes 357 Mbits/sec 30786 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 42.5 MBytes 357 Mbits/sec 30779 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 42.4 MBytes 356 Mbits/sec 30691 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 42.5 MBytes 357 Mbits/sec 30782 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 42.9 MBytes 360 Mbits/sec 31052 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 42.9 MBytes 360 Mbits/sec 31049 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 42.9 MBytes 360 Mbits/sec 31046 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 42.9 MBytes 359 Mbits/sec 31034 &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 42.9 MBytes 360 Mbits/sec 31042 &lt;BR /&gt;- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -&lt;BR /&gt;[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 427 MBytes 358 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/309048 (0%) sender&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 158 MBytes 132 Mbits/sec 0.036 ms 194168/308873 (63%) receiver&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;iperf Done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Server:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Server listening on 5201&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Accepted connection from 10.88.11.11, port 50210&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] local 10.88.22.22 port 5201 connected to 10.88.11.11 port 55031&lt;BR /&gt;[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 14.8 MBytes 124 Mbits/sec 0.051 ms 18419/29132 (63%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 16.3 MBytes 136 Mbits/sec 0.046 ms 19008/30790 (62%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 16.1 MBytes 135 Mbits/sec 0.044 ms 19152/30782 (62%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 16.0 MBytes 135 Mbits/sec 0.048 ms 19070/30683 (62%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 15.9 MBytes 133 Mbits/sec 0.048 ms 19260/30762 (63%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 15.8 MBytes 132 Mbits/sec 0.042 ms 19629/31054 (63%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 15.8 MBytes 132 Mbits/sec 0.052 ms 19636/31045 (63%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 15.5 MBytes 130 Mbits/sec 0.052 ms 19812/31039 (64%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 15.6 MBytes 130 Mbits/sec 0.037 ms 19775/31040 (64%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 16.0 MBytes 134 Mbits/sec 0.059 ms 19465/31049 (63%) &lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 10.00-10.05 sec 785 KBytes 133 Mbits/sec 0.036 ms 942/1497 (63%) &lt;BR /&gt;- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -&lt;BR /&gt;[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 158 MBytes 132 Mbits/sec 0.036 ms 194168/308873 (63%) receiver&lt;BR /&gt;iperf3: the client has unexpectedly closed the connection&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Server listening on 5201&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see, the packet loss is very high. Has anyone experience similar issue or know the root cause?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 21:33:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/798675#M123516</guid>
      <dc:creator>sonpham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-19T21:33:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q Ethernet UDP Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/798676#M123517</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Son&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please check below reports, in particular measurements dependancy of iperf version:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues/296" title="https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues/296"&gt;Extremely high packet loss with UDP test · Issue #296 · esnet/iperf · GitHub&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/798676#M123517</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-19T23:12:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q Ethernet UDP Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/798677#M123518</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" data-content-finding="Community" data-userid="206296" data-username="igorpadykov" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/igorpadykov"&gt;igorpadykov&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;what would you recommend for us to evaluate&amp;nbsp;UDP link then?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:48:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/798677#M123518</guid>
      <dc:creator>sonpham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-20T15:48:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q Ethernet UDP Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/1551223#M197368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a performance improvement if you turn ON ethernet flow control (pause frames) in your switch.&amp;nbsp; Then the imx6 will pause the flow as the UDP buffer fills up.&amp;nbsp; I have seen the imx6 receive at 30 mbit/s with zero dropped packets with flow control on.&amp;nbsp; Without flow control, even 8 mbit/s is too fast and it drops some packets.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should be able to run this command and get zero loss.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;iperf3 -u -c 10.88.22.22 -b 30M&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 17:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-Ethernet-UDP-Performance/m-p/1551223#M197368</guid>
      <dc:creator>jontsmith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-09T17:28:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

