<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11 in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779276#M121087</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to work with kexec and kdump on kernel&amp;nbsp;rel_imx_4.1.15_2.1.0_ga without success:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="link-titled" href="https://community.nxp.com/message/982634?commentID=982634#comment-982634" title="https://community.nxp.com/message/982634?commentID=982634#comment-982634"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/message/982634?commentID=982634#comment-982634&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As sugested by &lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/FabioEstevam"&gt;FabioEstevam&lt;/A&gt;‌ on this comment. I start a new topic and run the test with 4.9.11 release instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem is that with this kernel I am not able to init crashkernel anymore :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H6&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;# dmesg | grep -i crash&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;crashkernel reservation failed - memory is in use.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H6&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was using the same kernel parameter than before :&amp;nbsp;crashkernel=50M@0x81000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A message on mailing list kernel is talking about CMA and crashkernel :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1172154.html" title="https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1172154.html"&gt;Proposal for run time memory allocation for crash kernel&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;. Its seems that we have to use memory block in CMA block ? I have a CMA in my kernel command (&lt;STRONG&gt;cma=96M&lt;/STRONG&gt;). Message from kernel which show the cma :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H6&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;# dmesg | grep -i cma&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Reserved memory: created CMA memory pool at 0x8a000000, size 96 MiB&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H6&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I tried to init crashkernel with :&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;crashkernel=50M@0x8a000000&lt;/STRONG&gt; but the result is the same.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;Unfortunately I dont have anymore an imx6ull or imx6ul evk to run the test, my evk&amp;nbsp;are broken. I will order a new one today. I will try to test kdump on evk with official release as soon as possible.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;Arthur.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arthur_rythm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-01T14:58:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779276#M121087</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to work with kexec and kdump on kernel&amp;nbsp;rel_imx_4.1.15_2.1.0_ga without success:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="link-titled" href="https://community.nxp.com/message/982634?commentID=982634#comment-982634" title="https://community.nxp.com/message/982634?commentID=982634#comment-982634"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/message/982634?commentID=982634#comment-982634&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As sugested by &lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/FabioEstevam"&gt;FabioEstevam&lt;/A&gt;‌ on this comment. I start a new topic and run the test with 4.9.11 release instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem is that with this kernel I am not able to init crashkernel anymore :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H6&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;# dmesg | grep -i crash&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;crashkernel reservation failed - memory is in use.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H6&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was using the same kernel parameter than before :&amp;nbsp;crashkernel=50M@0x81000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A message on mailing list kernel is talking about CMA and crashkernel :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1172154.html" title="https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1172154.html"&gt;Proposal for run time memory allocation for crash kernel&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;. Its seems that we have to use memory block in CMA block ? I have a CMA in my kernel command (&lt;STRONG&gt;cma=96M&lt;/STRONG&gt;). Message from kernel which show the cma :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H6&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;# dmesg | grep -i cma&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Reserved memory: created CMA memory pool at 0x8a000000, size 96 MiB&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H6&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I tried to init crashkernel with :&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;crashkernel=50M@0x8a000000&lt;/STRONG&gt; but the result is the same.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;Unfortunately I dont have anymore an imx6ull or imx6ul evk to run the test, my evk&amp;nbsp;are broken. I will order a new one today. I will try to test kdump on evk with official release as soon as possible.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;Arthur.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779276#M121087</guid>
      <dc:creator>arthur_rythm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T14:58:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779277#M121088</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arthur, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not quite sure what the problem is with crashkernel on your system. Seems to work fine on my 4.1.15 kernel on an i.MX 6QP SDB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class=""&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;root@imx6qpsabresd:~# dmesg | egrep -i crash
[&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.000000] Reserving 50MB of memory at 960MB for crashkernel (System RAM: 1024MB)&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, it doesn't seem to matter what I put in the cma= kernel parameter. It always sets it to 320 MiB at 0x3c000000. Below the size is ignored, but it seems to ignore addresses too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class=""&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;root@imx6qpsabresd:~# dmesg | egrep -i cma
[&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.000000] Reserved memory: created CMA memory pool at 0x3c000000, size 320 MiB
[&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.000000] Reserved memory: initialized node linux,cma, compatible id shared-dma-pool
[&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.000000] Kernel command line: console=ttymxc0,115200 root=/dev/mmcblk2p2 rootwait rw video=mxcfb0:dev=hdmi,1920x1080M@60,if=RGB24 psplash=false vt.global_cursor_default=0 cma=96M@0x3c000000 crashkernel=50M@0x3c000000
[&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.000000] Memory: 697660K/1048576K available (8616K kernel code, 526K rwdata, 3144K rodata, 436K init, 458K bss, 23236K reserved, 327680K cma-reserved, 0K highmem)&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking forward to your EVK results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Carlos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779277#M121088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carlos_Musich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-15T18:31:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779278#M121089</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the delay I was out of office for few weeks. So I received my imx6ull evk.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Test result are exactly the same on evk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For both test :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;device tree :&amp;nbsp;imx6ull-14x14-evk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kernel defconfig : imx_v7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uboot git :&amp;nbsp;git://git.freescale.com/imx/uboot-imx.git&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uboot release :&amp;nbsp;rel_imx_4.1.15_2.1.0_ga&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;git kernel :&amp;nbsp;git://git.freescale.com/imx/linux-imx.git&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tag release :&amp;nbsp;rel_imx_4.1.15_2.0.0_ga&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Result : load kernel with kexec. Simulate kernel panic then freeze after this output :&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;[&amp;lt;803476f8&amp;gt;] (sysrq_handle_crash) from [&amp;lt;00000000&amp;gt;] ( (null))&lt;BR /&gt;Code: e5c32000 e8bd8010 e3a03000 e3a02001 (e5c32000) &lt;BR /&gt;Loading crashdump kernel...&lt;BR /&gt;Bye&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;git kernel :&amp;nbsp;git://git.freescale.com/imx/linux-imx.git&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tag release :&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;rel_imx_4.9.x_1.0.0_ga&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Result : crashkernel init failed :&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# dmesg | grep -i crash&lt;BR /&gt;crashkernel reservation failed - memory is in use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779278#M121089</guid>
      <dc:creator>arthur_rythm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T16:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779279#M121090</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone to test on his own imx6ull evk to confirm my result ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 08:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779279#M121090</guid>
      <dc:creator>arthur_rythm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-08T08:59:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779280#M121091</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arthur,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tested on a 4.9 NXP kernel and it worked fine:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# dmesg | grep crash&lt;BR /&gt;Reserving 50MB of memory at 2176MB for crashkernel (System RAM: 512MB)&lt;BR /&gt;Kernel command line: console=ttymxc0,115200 root=/dev/mmcblk1p2 rootwait rw crashkernel=50M&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please note that I use 'crashkernel=50M' with no extra parameters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:42:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779280#M121091</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabio_estevam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-15T16:42:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779281#M121092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Always KO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Topic on linux arm mailing list :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10296799/" title="https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10296799/"&gt;issue with kexec/kdump on imx6ull - Patchwork&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was able to fix an issue related to kexec thanks to Russel. ARM support is broken in official kexec repository. But my test always&amp;nbsp;failed&amp;nbsp;even after the fix. I have probably more issue on my evk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to enable earlyprintk to try to debug kernel hang but no output :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loading crashdump kernel...&lt;BR /&gt;Bye!&lt;BR /&gt;Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kexec is probably not able to find the kernel.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 08:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779281#M121092</guid>
      <dc:creator>arthur_rythm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-06T08:57:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779282#M121093</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you try with kernel 4.16 and see if it works there?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 15:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779282#M121093</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabio_estevam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-06T15:35:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779283#M121094</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am able to load the kexec kernel correctly after the kernel panic now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to check now if I am able to read the dump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using the mainline kernel&amp;nbsp;v4.16-rc7 +&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;imx_v6_v7 defconfig. it reminds me this nice topic :&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/thread/385542"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/thread/385542&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try to align defconfig and perhaps kernel/kexec_core to find the issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:26:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/779283#M121094</guid>
      <dc:creator>arthur_rythm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-09T08:26:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/1448292#M189625</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for your reply , I confirm it has good result. I couldn't execute "kexec -p " successfully before that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 06:18:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/1448292#M189625</guid>
      <dc:creator>billchen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-25T06:18:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: kexec and kdump in imx6ull with kernel 4.9.11</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/1448326#M189627</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;but after I run "echo c &amp;gt;/proc/sysrq-trigger"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It stopped at&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Loading crashdump kernel...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bye! "&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; "&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:05:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/kexec-and-kdump-in-imx6ull-with-kernel-4-9-11/m-p/1448326#M189627</guid>
      <dc:creator>billchen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-25T07:05:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

