<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: i.MX6ULL interrupt table issue? in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-interrupt-table-issue/m-p/777648#M120736</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Felix&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interrupt table did not change, changed only representation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rev.1 did not include offset for 32 interrupts, as described in sect.3.2I.MX6ULL RM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cortex A7 interrupts The Global Interrupt Controller (GIC) collects up to 128 interrupt requests&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from all chip sources and provides an interface to the Cortex A7 CPU. The first 32 interrupts are&lt;BR /&gt;private to the CPUs' interface. These interrupts are not included in the table below..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Detailed description of GIC interrupts usage can be found in SDK documentation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Github SDK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fbackenklee%2Fswp-report%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FiMX6_Platform_SDK" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/backenklee/swp-report/tree/master/iMX6_Platform_SDK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-01T06:31:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>i.MX6ULL interrupt table issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-interrupt-table-issue/m-p/777647#M120735</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you explanation the i.MX6ULL&amp;nbsp;interrupt table IRQ number why different between the i.MX6ULLRM rev0 and&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;i.MX6ULLRM rev1?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i.MX6ULL REV0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_2.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34919iF8C0EBD5E5C616E8/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_2.png" alt="pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i.MX6ULLRM REV1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_1.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34879i4E3CE0D31D92225D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_1.png" alt="pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 02:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-interrupt-table-issue/m-p/777647#M120735</guid>
      <dc:creator>felixhsu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T02:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6ULL interrupt table issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-interrupt-table-issue/m-p/777648#M120736</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Felix&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interrupt table did not change, changed only representation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rev.1 did not include offset for 32 interrupts, as described in sect.3.2I.MX6ULL RM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cortex A7 interrupts The Global Interrupt Controller (GIC) collects up to 128 interrupt requests&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from all chip sources and provides an interface to the Cortex A7 CPU. The first 32 interrupts are&lt;BR /&gt;private to the CPUs' interface. These interrupts are not included in the table below..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Detailed description of GIC interrupts usage can be found in SDK documentation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Github SDK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fbackenklee%2Fswp-report%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FiMX6_Platform_SDK" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/backenklee/swp-report/tree/master/iMX6_Platform_SDK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-interrupt-table-issue/m-p/777648#M120736</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T06:31:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

