<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Linux and Bare Metal with shared memory and cache coherency settings? in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751527#M116970</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;You may look at erratum ERR004325 [ARM/MP: 764369—Data or unified cache line maintenance &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;operation by MVA may not succeed on an Inner Shareable memory region] and try its workaround.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nxp.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Ferrata%2FIMX6DQCE.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX6DQCE.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 06:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-27T06:12:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linux and Bare Metal with shared memory and cache coherency settings?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751523#M116966</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to make a shared memory between linux (core0) and my bare metal (Core1) system. It works if I configure the mmu_map_l1_range in the mmu.c in my bare metal system as noncacheable! If I try to change the settings to kOuterInner_WB_WA and I activated SCU (also on CP15) because I want to use cache coherency it doesn’t work anymore! I only modified the MMU TLB setting on my bare metal system. Do I need to change also settings on the linux side to achieve cache coherency for the shared memory area.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards Christoph&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:29:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751523#M116966</guid>
      <dc:creator>christoph8446</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-30T13:29:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux and Bare Metal with shared memory and cache coherency settings?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751524#M116967</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I.MX6 does not support cache coherency (in hardware). Therefore it may&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;be recommended to configure shared memory area as non-cached, if several&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;bus masters can access it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751524#M116967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-01T09:13:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux and Bare Metal with shared memory and cache coherency settings?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751525#M116968</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The SCU maintain data cache coherency between the Cortex-A9 processors right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:21:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751525#M116968</guid>
      <dc:creator>christoph8446</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-01T10:21:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux and Bare Metal with shared memory and cache coherency settings?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751526#M116969</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having a similar problem - but I don't understand your answer. I thought L1 cache coherency is part of the ARM A9 MPCore architecture? It should be managed through the use of the SMP bit in the ACTLR and the SCU?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you saying that I cannot use the SMP bit and the SCU (along with configuring a memory region as shared in the MMU map) to create cache coherent memory areas between A9 cores?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751526#M116969</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathanankers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-26T08:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux and Bare Metal with shared memory and cache coherency settings?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751527#M116970</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;You may look at erratum ERR004325 [ARM/MP: 764369—Data or unified cache line maintenance &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;operation by MVA may not succeed on an Inner Shareable memory region] and try its workaround.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nxp.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Ferrata%2FIMX6DQCE.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX6DQCE.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 06:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Linux-and-Bare-Metal-with-shared-memory-and-cache-coherency/m-p/751527#M116970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-27T06:12:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

