<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: i.MX6ULL VDD_ARM_CAP voltage changes</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725857#M112885</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri –&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks as if that worked, it changed the behavior VDD_ARM from CC to CV.  Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chadwolter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-20T14:16:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>i.MX6ULL VDD_ARM_CAP voltage changes</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725853#M112881</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see attached oscilloscope capture of the VDD_ARM_CAP (LDO_ARM) pin in a custom i.MX6ULL design.&amp;nbsp; As can be seen, the voltage of this rail, which is nominally supposed to be 1.15VDC, is changing its voltage regularly.&amp;nbsp; This is occurring when our Linux kernel boots and after it has been running.&amp;nbsp; Per the i.MX6ULL reference guide (version 11/2017), section 39.2, would the output in the attached scope capture be consistent with behavior if the device was in "Power Gate" mode?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Per the Reference manual, section 39.2, there are 3 modes for the Digital LDOs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Power Gate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Analog regulation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Bypass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking now at section 39.6.4 (PMU_REG_COREn definition), in the REG0_TARG field, would the following settings map to the modes above?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; REG0_TARG = 0b00000 -&amp;gt; Analog Regulation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; 0b00001 &amp;lt;= REG0_TARG &amp;lt;= 0b11110 -&amp;gt; Power Gate, with voltage setting per the register value&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. REG0_TARG = 0b11111 -&amp;gt; Bypass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further, how do I set these modes in Linux?&amp;nbsp; I am looking to do this WITHOUT using the API function calls referenced in Chapter 26 of the Linux Reference manual.&amp;nbsp; I have looked in the device tree included with the version 4.9.11 Linux release from NXP (imx6ull.dtsi), but I do not see any setting in the anatop regulator definition that would correspond to the REG0_TARG bits of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;PMU_REG_COREn&amp;nbsp;register:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; reg_arm: regulator-vddcore@140 {&lt;BR /&gt; compatible = "fsl,anatop-regulator";&lt;BR /&gt; regulator-name = "cpu";&lt;BR /&gt; regulator-min-microvolt = &amp;lt;725000&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; regulator-max-microvolt = &amp;lt;1450000&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; regulator-always-on;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-reg-offset = &amp;lt;0x140&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-vol-bit-shift = &amp;lt;0&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-vol-bit-width = &amp;lt;5&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-delay-reg-offset = &amp;lt;0x170&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-delay-bit-shift = &amp;lt;24&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-delay-bit-width = &amp;lt;2&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-min-bit-val = &amp;lt;1&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-min-voltage = &amp;lt;725000&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; anatop-max-voltage = &amp;lt;1450000&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt; };&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Further, I have looked in the /sys/devices/soc0/soc/2000000.aips-bus/20c8000.anatop directory on a running version of the kernel, and I cannot find any settings there either to touch this register.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please help me solve this issue, or at least explain why I am seeing the core voltage change&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;kind regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Chad Wolter&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725853#M112881</guid>
      <dc:creator>chadwolter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-11T20:31:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6ULL VDD_ARM_CAP voltage changes</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725854#M112882</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; From Linux documentation:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; Some internal regulator can be bypassed, so that external pmic can supply &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;these power directly to decrease power consumption, such as VDD_SOC, VDD_ARM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; In standard DTB file, the LDO bypass is enabled. Therefore, it is needed to use special DTB files, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;if LDO should be enabled.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 05:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725854#M112882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-18T05:51:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6ULL VDD_ARM_CAP voltage changes</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725855#M112883</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri –&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Respectfully, you are incorrect.  If you look in the imx6ull.dtsi file (the device tree include file that gets built when creating the dtb), the CORE LDO is NOT getting bypassed (see regulator-always-on statement).  Please re-read my post an answer accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725855#M112883</guid>
      <dc:creator>chadwolter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-18T13:10:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6ULL VDD_ARM_CAP voltage changes</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725856#M112884</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;You may&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;"&gt;try to disable CPUFREQ to check if it influences here.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.5pt; color: #51626f; background: white;"&gt;# echo performance &amp;gt; /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725856#M112884</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-19T07:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6ULL VDD_ARM_CAP voltage changes</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725857#M112885</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri –&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks as if that worked, it changed the behavior VDD_ARM from CC to CV.  Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6ULL-VDD-ARM-CAP-voltage-changes/m-p/725857#M112885</guid>
      <dc:creator>chadwolter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-20T14:16:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

