<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Should SD1_CD_B be pulled low for Wi-Fi over SDIO (i.mx6ULL)? in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Should-SD1-CD-B-be-pulled-low-for-Wi-Fi-over-SDIO-i-mx6ULL/m-p/695639#M107870</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;We have a WiFi module always connected to i.MX6ULL processor over SDIO interface (4bit mode). My doubt is regarding&amp;nbsp;SD1_CD_B pin. Is it necessary to have a pull down on this pin&amp;nbsp;for SDIO to function? ( thought I could save a pin). In some designs (like Atmel) I could see DATA_3 pulled up for some purpose (DATA 3 also functions as card detect in that case).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.MX6ULL &amp;nbsp;says DATA_3 functions as a card detect in 1 bit mode.&lt;BR /&gt;Kindly&amp;nbsp;clear clear the air.&lt;BR /&gt;Must I pull down&amp;nbsp;SD1_CD_B or give pull ups on the data lines for a WiFi module to work over SDIO?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will the SDIO interface work by tweaking software if&amp;nbsp;SD1_CD_B is not used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 06:45:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>abin444</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-06T06:45:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Should SD1_CD_B be pulled low for Wi-Fi over SDIO (i.mx6ULL)?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Should-SD1-CD-B-be-pulled-low-for-Wi-Fi-over-SDIO-i-mx6ULL/m-p/695639#M107870</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;We have a WiFi module always connected to i.MX6ULL processor over SDIO interface (4bit mode). My doubt is regarding&amp;nbsp;SD1_CD_B pin. Is it necessary to have a pull down on this pin&amp;nbsp;for SDIO to function? ( thought I could save a pin). In some designs (like Atmel) I could see DATA_3 pulled up for some purpose (DATA 3 also functions as card detect in that case).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.MX6ULL &amp;nbsp;says DATA_3 functions as a card detect in 1 bit mode.&lt;BR /&gt;Kindly&amp;nbsp;clear clear the air.&lt;BR /&gt;Must I pull down&amp;nbsp;SD1_CD_B or give pull ups on the data lines for a WiFi module to work over SDIO?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will the SDIO interface work by tweaking software if&amp;nbsp;SD1_CD_B is not used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 06:45:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Should-SD1-CD-B-be-pulled-low-for-Wi-Fi-over-SDIO-i-mx6ULL/m-p/695639#M107870</guid>
      <dc:creator>abin444</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-06T06:45:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should SD1_CD_B be pulled low for Wi-Fi over SDIO (i.mx6ULL)?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Should-SD1-CD-B-be-pulled-low-for-Wi-Fi-over-SDIO-i-mx6ULL/m-p/695640#M107871</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Abin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is optional and depends on dts settings for usage usdhc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;controller internal card detection, for available options please refer to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sect.32.3.3 Devicetree Binding attached Linux Manual.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Should-SD1-CD-B-be-pulled-low-for-Wi-Fi-over-SDIO-i-mx6ULL/m-p/695640#M107871</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-06T07:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should SD1_CD_B be pulled low for Wi-Fi over SDIO (i.mx6ULL)?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Should-SD1-CD-B-be-pulled-low-for-Wi-Fi-over-SDIO-i-mx6ULL/m-p/695641#M107872</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you! That solves it :smileyhappy:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Should-SD1-CD-B-be-pulled-low-for-Wi-Fi-over-SDIO-i-mx6ULL/m-p/695641#M107872</guid>
      <dc:creator>abin444</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-11T12:23:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

