<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DDR3 T Branch routing in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-T-Branch-routing/m-p/684374#M105820</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about routing topology of DDR3. In design I use two&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;DDR3s, which are connected in T branch topology. Then termination and extra Vtt regulator are not necessary.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should the address trace&amp;nbsp;(ADDR0..ADDR15) from T branch to both memories the same length?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jozef&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:59:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jozef_s</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-12T14:59:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DDR3 T Branch routing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-T-Branch-routing/m-p/684374#M105820</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about routing topology of DDR3. In design I use two&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;DDR3s, which are connected in T branch topology. Then termination and extra Vtt regulator are not necessary.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should the address trace&amp;nbsp;(ADDR0..ADDR15) from T branch to both memories the same length?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jozef&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:59:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-T-Branch-routing/m-p/684374#M105820</guid>
      <dc:creator>jozef_s</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-12T14:59:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DDR3 T Branch routing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-T-Branch-routing/m-p/684375#M105821</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Jozef Szigl,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, when using T topology, the address signals should be the same length for all DDR chips. There is some margin, &amp;nbsp;You don’t mention which processor you are using but for the i.MX6 for example address traces routing should match with a ± 25 mils margin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can find more details on recommended routing for the i.MX6 on the HW Design Guide (link below), although these are not unique to the i.MX6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nxp.com%2Fassets%2Fdocuments%2Fdata%2Fen%2Fuser-guides%2FIMX6DQ6SDLHDG.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.nxp.com/assets/documents/data/en/user-guides/IMX6DQ6SDLHDG.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 16:56:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-T-Branch-routing/m-p/684375#M105821</guid>
      <dc:creator>gusarambula</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-12T16:56:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

