<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680991#M105184</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have accessed EIM write and read in u-boot in IMX6Quad processor, where we have got a turn around time of 230ns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scope image for configuration data bus Data 0-16 is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS0GCR1 = 0x00010081&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0GCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="scope_u-boot.bmp"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/24674i5173552A37EA76C2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="scope_u-boot.bmp" alt="scope_u-boot.bmp" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where the turn around time is not in range as we expected, so we opted for IMX6QuadPlus processor where internal bus frequency is higher and faster. But the turn around time here is 330ns,100ns more than the IMX6Quad processor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scope image for configuration data bus Data 16-31 in IMX6QP SabreSD board is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS0GCR1 = 0x00020081&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0GCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="scope_11.bmp"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/24754iCB5C2C87843B6F58/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="scope_11.bmp" alt="scope_11.bmp" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why performance drop from IMX6Q to IMX6QP processor ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any bus registers configurations need to be changed for better performance to achieve turn around time less than 100ns?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>udayakumar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-03T12:40:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680991#M105184</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have accessed EIM write and read in u-boot in IMX6Quad processor, where we have got a turn around time of 230ns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scope image for configuration data bus Data 0-16 is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS0GCR1 = 0x00010081&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0GCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="scope_u-boot.bmp"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/24674i5173552A37EA76C2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="scope_u-boot.bmp" alt="scope_u-boot.bmp" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where the turn around time is not in range as we expected, so we opted for IMX6QuadPlus processor where internal bus frequency is higher and faster. But the turn around time here is 330ns,100ns more than the IMX6Quad processor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scope image for configuration data bus Data 16-31 in IMX6QP SabreSD board is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS0GCR1 = 0x00020081&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0GCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0RCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR1 = 0x02000000&lt;BR /&gt;EIM_CS0WCR2 = 0x00000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="scope_11.bmp"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/24754iCB5C2C87843B6F58/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="scope_11.bmp" alt="scope_11.bmp" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why performance drop from IMX6Q to IMX6QP processor ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any bus registers configurations need to be changed for better performance to achieve turn around time less than 100ns?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680991#M105184</guid>
      <dc:creator>udayakumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T12:40:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680992#M105185</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi uday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;delays are introduced mostly by bus arbiters nic301 and since i.MX6QuadPlus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has more complex architecture, it may have more delays. Difference is described in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EB810 i.MX6Dual/6Quad and i.MX6DualPlus/6QuadPlus Applications Processor Comparison&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://cache.nxp.com/docs/en/engineering-bulletin/EB810.pdf" title="http://cache.nxp.com/docs/en/engineering-bulletin/EB810.pdf"&gt;http://cache.nxp.com/docs/en/engineering-bulletin/EB810.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general one can try to tweak QoS (EIM connected to GPV_3) usingsect.47.3.3.1 NIC-301 QoS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reference Manual.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:50:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680992#M105185</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T23:50:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680993#M105186</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Write QoS: "0x00C4_9104"&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; what is the minmum and maximum value can be written?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680993#M105186</guid>
      <dc:creator>udayakumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-31T15:27:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680994#M105187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi uday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it is 4 bit wide and description can be found in arm NIC-301 Technical Reference Manual&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0397i/DDI0397I_corelink_network_interconnect_nic301_trm.pdf" title="http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0397i/DDI0397I_corelink_network_interconnect_nic301_trm.pdf"&gt;http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0397i/DDI0397I_corelink_network_interconnect_nic301_trm.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:58:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680994#M105187</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-31T23:58:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680995#M105188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I could not find EIM apb_slave index in imx6 reference manaul. Could you please share me the apb_slave index of EIM and its QoS default value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:19:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680995#M105188</guid>
      <dc:creator>udayakumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-01T09:19:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680996#M105189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;seems it is GPV_3 index=82, default value=2 as for&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;other peripherals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680996#M105189</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-01T11:03:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM performance difference between IMX6Quad and IMX6QuadPlus</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680997#M105190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Igor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I try to write 0x03 and read back value is 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In data sheet its given as reserved ,have any idea to write and read and need to take care anything?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;uday&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 07:45:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-performance-difference-between-IMX6Quad-and-IMX6QuadPlus/m-p/680997#M105190</guid>
      <dc:creator>udayakumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-04T07:45:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

