<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cold Boot Crash at .925V VDDARM_IN level in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659863#M101273</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if pmic is used in the case, but one can carefully check&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;power up sequence and observe with oscilloscope for any glitches on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VDDHIGH_*, VDD_SNVS_* lines. If after fail pressing por will lead to successful boot,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this may point to ddr initialization problems. Also one can try to extend por up to 0.8-1 sec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-01T00:44:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cold Boot Crash at .925V VDDARM_IN level</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659860#M101270</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We had an issue with i.MX6 automotive quad core crashing during boot but only when cold (a few boot crashed&amp;nbsp;as warm as 10C to 15C) and when VDDARM_CAP dropped from 1.2V (792MHz) to .925V (assume 396Mhz while IO was being set up). &amp;nbsp;Also crashes during the same .925V condition on power down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Found that reducing VDDARM_IN and VDDSOC_IN voltages from 1.475V to 1.3V have significantly lowered the temperature at which crashes occur. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure this fixes the issue correctly since the condition for VDD_CACHE_CAP must be less than 200mV above VDDARM_CAP is violated with either VDDARM_IN supply level during the crash periods (when LDO is at .925V). &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why is reducing the VDDARM_IN and VDDSOC_IN input levels making a difference at the temperature that the boot crashes occur?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate any insight into why this works or other ways to address the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alan M&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:48:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659860#M101270</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-22T21:48:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cold Boot Crash at .925V VDDARM_IN level</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659861#M101271</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for reliable reboot recommended to reset both pmic (with pwron signal) and&lt;BR /&gt;procesor (with por), as it is done on Sabre SD schematic spf-27392 p.21 U507 buffer.&lt;BR /&gt;Otherwise since cpu freq driver may lower VDDARM_IN level, if processor resets at this time,&lt;BR /&gt;it can be insufficient for reliable boot. Resetting pmic provides necessary voltages for &lt;BR /&gt;reliable (re)boot. Temperature issues may be related to incorrect drive strength settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2017 23:00:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659861#M101271</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-26T23:00:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cold Boot Crash at .925V VDDARM_IN level</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659862#M101272</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently the CPU is running on internal LDOs and does not adjust the PMIC output levels. &amp;nbsp; When we reduce VDDARM_IN to boot colder we are reducing the overhead voltage for&amp;nbsp;the LDOs.&amp;nbsp; We've set VDDARM_IN &amp;amp; VDDSOC_IN&amp;nbsp;to 1.35V to&amp;nbsp;lower the boot crash temperature to about -3C. &amp;nbsp;Still not sure why it works. &amp;nbsp;MMPF0100 PMIC outputs are configured&amp;nbsp;to deliver max current.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have also adjusted the DVFS lower frequency voltage setting higher to remove the VDD_CACHE_CAP - VDDARM_CAP &amp;gt; 200mV violation. &amp;nbsp; This really helps and allows booting down to -18C without issue (much below our instrument requirement). &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any additional info about these settings or the issue is appreciated. &amp;nbsp; We plan to go forward with these changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Igor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alan&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659862#M101272</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-28T16:43:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cold Boot Crash at .925V VDDARM_IN level</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659863#M101273</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if pmic is used in the case, but one can carefully check&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;power up sequence and observe with oscilloscope for any glitches on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VDDHIGH_*, VDD_SNVS_* lines. If after fail pressing por will lead to successful boot,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this may point to ddr initialization problems. Also one can try to extend por up to 0.8-1 sec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Cold-Boot-Crash-at-925V-VDDARM-IN-level/m-p/659863#M101273</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-01T00:44:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

