<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659525#M101220</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; The problem may be concerned with system performance issue.&amp;nbsp;One of system bottleneck is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;memory throughput.&amp;nbsp; The i.MX 6UL supports 16-bit DRAMs up to 400 MHz.&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt; Please try using mmdc profiling tool, that may be found in /unit_test directory of i.MX6UL Linux&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;demo&amp;nbsp; image :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;root@imx6ul7d:/unit_tests# ./mmdc2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For usage detail refer to the following :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://developer.ridgerun.com/wiki/index.php?title=IMX6_Memory_Bandwidth_usage" title="https://developer.ridgerun.com/wiki/index.php?title=IMX6_Memory_Bandwidth_usage"&gt;IMX6 Memory Bandwidth usage - RidgeRun Developer Connection&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; General consideration in Community may be helpful :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/thread/309197"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/thread/309197&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:30:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-21T07:30:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659517#M101212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We designed a custom board based on IMX6UL. Everything works well&amp;nbsp;except the ENET (phy chip: KSZ8081RNB).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We got a very high error / frame rates (around 30-50%)in "ifconfig". Error number&amp;nbsp;is always the same as frame's and it is rx_crc_error. The board takes about 5 mins to get an IP from our router. We checked the cable and router and they both are good. We also checked "ethtool eth0". Please see the logs below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have any ideas that why the error rate is so high ? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;root@BlueHub-1FAC:~# ifconfig&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr CE:AC:A1:03:EA:CB&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; inet addr:192.168.66.80 Bcast:192.168.66.255 Mask:255.255.255.0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; inet6 addr: fe80::ccac:a1ff:fe03:eacb/64 Scope:Link&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt; RX packets:130 errors:15 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:15&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; TX packets:137 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; RX bytes:18661 (18.2 KiB) TX bytes:23404 (22.8 KiB)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;root@BlueHub-1FAC:~# ethtool eth0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Settings for eth0:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Supported ports: [ TP MII ]&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Supported pause frame use: Symmetric&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Supports auto-negotiation: Yes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Link partner advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Speed: 100Mb/s&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Duplex: Full&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Port: MII&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; PHYAD: 2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Transceiver: external&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Auto-negotiation: on&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Supports Wake-on: g&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Wake-on: d&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Link detected: yes&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 00:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659517#M101212</guid>
      <dc:creator>shu_liu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-08T00:22:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659518#M101213</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; What BSP is used in the case ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have You tried the recent BSP of NXP ?&lt;BR /&gt;Is a PHY driver applied ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to look at the schematic ? &lt;BR /&gt;You may create request in order to send the scheme.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 01:34:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659518#M101213</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-08T01:34:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659519#M101214</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our BSP is the&amp;nbsp;linux-4.1.15-1.2.0+g77f6154. It is a recent one, but not the latest. Latest should be 2.0.0 instead of 1.2.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes the PHY driver applied and please see the logs below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not know how to attach PDF, but I insert it as an image.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="enet_sch.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1637i0FE044F91C21A2E0/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="enet_sch.jpg" alt="enet_sch.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: Freescale FEC PHY driver [Micrel KSZ8081 or KSZ8091] (mii_bus:phy_addr=2188000.ethernet:02, irq=-1)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Starting Hostname Service...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Starting WPA supplicant...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;[FAILED] Failed to start Hostname Service.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;See 'systemctl status systemd-hostnamed.service' for details.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;[ OK ] Started WPA supplicant.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Freescale i.MX Release Distro 4.1.15-1.2.0 BlueHub-1FAC ttymxc0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BlueHub-1FAC login: fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control rx/tx&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659519#M101214</guid>
      <dc:creator>shu_liu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-10T18:33:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659520#M101215</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; Please check Your clock configuration : according to section 10.4 (Generating the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;reference clock on chip) of the Hardware DevelopmentGuide :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;There are two possible pins that can either source or sink the reference &lt;BR /&gt;clock: GPIO_16 and RGMII_TX_CTL. The GPIO_16 pin is the preferred choice &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;because it has the advantage of being in a high voltage IO domain,&lt;BR /&gt;which means it can be used at the standard 3.3 V IO voltage levels.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://cache.nxp.com/assets/documents/data/en/user-guides/IMX6DQ6SDLHDG.pdf" title="http://cache.nxp.com/assets/documents/data/en/user-guides/IMX6DQ6SDLHDG.pdf"&gt;http://cache.nxp.com/assets/documents/data/en/user-guides/IMX6DQ6SDLHDG.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659520#M101215</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-11T04:50:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659521#M101216</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I mentioned in earlier post, we use IMX6UL processor. The clock inputs to the PHY chip(see the schematic in my last post) are ENET1_TX_CLK (RMII clock) and ENET_MDC(MDIO clock). We checked both signals. They are proper clocks and similar to the IMX6UL 14X14 EVK's.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659521#M101216</guid>
      <dc:creator>shu_liu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-11T16:16:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659522#M101217</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Have You similar issues with i.MX6UL EVK undo NXP demo image ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:13:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659522#M101217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-19T05:13:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659523#M101218</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this issue resolved ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am seeing similar issue &lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/message/937004"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/message/937004&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any hint, would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:05:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659523#M101218</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanjeevsharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T12:05:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659524#M101219</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We still have this frame error issue. We found it is related to LCD_data lines. If LCD data lines(LCD_data0-23) are transferring data. Frame errors are happened and speed is really slow on the ethernet side. If LCD data lines are idle, ethernet works well. &amp;nbsp;Do you have any ideas ? We checked the ENET_CLK and MDC. Both clocks are good no matter LCD_data lines are busy or not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:02:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659524#M101219</guid>
      <dc:creator>shu_liu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-21T00:02:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659525#M101220</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; The problem may be concerned with system performance issue.&amp;nbsp;One of system bottleneck is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;memory throughput.&amp;nbsp; The i.MX 6UL supports 16-bit DRAMs up to 400 MHz.&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt; Please try using mmdc profiling tool, that may be found in /unit_test directory of i.MX6UL Linux&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;demo&amp;nbsp; image :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;root@imx6ul7d:/unit_tests# ./mmdc2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For usage detail refer to the following :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://developer.ridgerun.com/wiki/index.php?title=IMX6_Memory_Bandwidth_usage" title="https://developer.ridgerun.com/wiki/index.php?title=IMX6_Memory_Bandwidth_usage"&gt;IMX6 Memory Bandwidth usage - RidgeRun Developer Connection&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; General consideration in Community may be helpful :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/thread/309197"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/thread/309197&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:30:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659525#M101220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-21T07:30:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659526#M101221</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I work with Shu on the software side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have nothing running that would get near the memory bandwidth problem. Even 800 MB/s is quite a lot for an idle system. Again, we our board is quite similar to imx6ul EVK board and we are not observing any issues on that board.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we do this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Run Chrome - Perfromance is very bad. 1GB download = 2hours+, scp copy stalls etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kill chrome - Performance normal, ETA 10 minutes for 1GB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cat /dev/zero &amp;gt; /dev/fb0 &amp;nbsp;-&lt;SPAN&gt;Performance almost normal, ETA 10-20 minutes for 1GB.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;cat /dev/urandom &amp;gt; /dev/fb0 &amp;nbsp;- We can't even get an IP address fro DHCP. Communication&amp;nbsp;seems to stall completely.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We also noticed switching down to 10-BASE-T ethernet speed actually IMPROVES performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In addition to MDIO, RMI clocks and data lines, we have also analyzed Ethernet&amp;nbsp;signals on the wire, and they seem normal. There is a clean rise or fall every 100ms in 1-Base-T mode. All signals seem quite the same as the EVK board, unless we don't know what to look for.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We also have another revision of the board that with an NFC where we can completely disable the LCD by removing it from the device tree, but we still exhibit&amp;nbsp;issues on that board unless we switch it to 10 Mbps.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;All this leads us to belive that LCD itself is not the issue, but rather that the LCD and possibly some other factors&amp;nbsp;exacerbate the actual problem.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In addtion to us detecting RS framing errors, we have also connected the board to a linux PC and observed that the PC registers framing RX errors when we try to transmit DHCP packets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are suspecting that this could be a hardware issue, but if Ethernet signal and MII signals look clean, why are framing errors registered? Where should we focus focus our attention?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:54:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659526#M101221</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikmarkovic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-22T00:54:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659527#M101222</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Shu Liu,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you find a solution to this problem. I have been struggling with this same problem for about 2 years now. And still no solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659527#M101222</guid>
      <dc:creator>durmus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-30T15:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659528#M101223</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Nik Markovic,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you find a solution to this problem? I have been struggling with this same problem for about 2 years now. And still no solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:08:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659528#M101223</guid>
      <dc:creator>durmus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-30T15:08:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659529#M101224</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi NXP Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are also facing exactly same issue with Frame error for the same processor family IMX6ULL based custom board and Phy KSZ8081RNA. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our custom board is based on IMX6ULL EVK and working with BSP Ver 4.1.15-2.0.0_ga.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We tested in EVK using iperf3 the speed is very good with 100Mbps speed. And there are no errors with Rx frame.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But in our custom board we are facing issue with loss of received data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We varifyed the ethernet details using ethtool, all the parameters looks good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even SSH is working fine in our cust board without any issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SCP is very very slow, but works fine for smaller files like &amp;lt;1K and hangs/terminates for little larger files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our board changes with respect to EVK is listed here,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EVK&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Cust board&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Micrel KSZ8081RNB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Micrel KSZ8081RNA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phy Address 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Phy Address 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FEC0/FEC1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FEC0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RMII Clock mode: 25MHz External Crystal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have tried the solutions provided in this link as well as&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/thread/458823"&gt;RMII interface error on i.MX6Q(KSZ8051RNL)&lt;/A&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/thread/389902"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/thread/389902&lt;/A&gt; didn't helped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help us asap, since this is the only blockage we are facing to release the final product.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lokesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 13:14:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659529#M101224</guid>
      <dc:creator>lokeshvenkatara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-05T13:14:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ENET1 frame errors/rx_crc errors</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659530#M101225</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/shuliu"&gt;shuliu&lt;/A&gt;‌ &lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/nikmarkovic"&gt;nikmarkovic&lt;/A&gt;‌ &lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/sanjeevsharma"&gt;sanjeevsharma&lt;/A&gt;‌ &lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/lokeshvenkateshiah"&gt;lokeshvenkateshiah&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had faced the same issue and I found the issue in ENET clock pin in my custom board. We are providing the ENET clock from the processor pin and it is 50Mhz. Even though it is 50Mhz, I had seen issue in the register selection. In the imx6ull-14x14evk the value for the register is 10R. Using the same value for my imx6ull based custom board didn't work because of (may be) pcb trace length and width. I was using the same 10R earlier and it gives me crc and frame errors continuously.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to resolve it i had replace 10R resistance with the 20R resistance. It resolves my issue and i am seeing no crc/frame errors. You need to select the registancy according to your custom board design.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Digesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 07:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/ENET1-frame-errors-rx-crc-errors/m-p/659530#M101225</guid>
      <dc:creator>digesh_patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-06T07:39:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

