<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can it be used as Testing tool for Black box testing where we are not making changes in code ? in FreeMASTER</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/FreeMASTER/Can-it-be-used-as-Testing-tool-for-Black-box-testing-where-we/m-p/1055592#M212</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/vaibhav.bait999@gmail.com"&gt;vaibhav.bait999@gmail.com&lt;/A&gt;‌,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me first clarify the scope of the FreeMASTER tool, to check whether it fits your use-case: FreeMASTER's base functionality consists of monitoring and controlling embedded application variables by manipulating target memory, it does not go as low as simulating hardware inputs/outputs (for this one&amp;nbsp;you'd use a dedicated software such as CAN analyzer).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Can FreeMASTER monitor inputs/outputs ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Yes, in case the embedded application stores those values in dedicated variables. Also, the embedded application should continuously update those values (read inputs, write outputs).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Can FreeMASTER be used without code modifications ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The only options that does not require code changes is to use a debug probe BDM/JTAG that grants direct access to target memory. In all other options (CAN/LIN/UART) you'd need to embed FreeMASTER driver (library) into the embedded application in order to enable the communication.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iulian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iulian_stan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-04T11:38:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can it be used as Testing tool for Black box testing where we are not making changes in code ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/FreeMASTER/Can-it-be-used-as-Testing-tool-for-Black-box-testing-where-we/m-p/1055591#M211</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I work in automotive domain. We want to use freeMaster as testing tool for black box testing. Where inputs and outputs are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inputs&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : Hardwired pin signals to controller , CAN or LIN signals&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Outputs :&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hardwired pin signals to controller , CAN or LIN signals&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We also want fault insertion scenarios as well. Where&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. we will send one input&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Based on output , we will insert fault at specified time and watch another input.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How freeMaster can be used in these cases ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any other devices or tools needed along with freeMaster ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:32:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/FreeMASTER/Can-it-be-used-as-Testing-tool-for-Black-box-testing-where-we/m-p/1055591#M211</guid>
      <dc:creator>vaibhav_bait999</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T10:32:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can it be used as Testing tool for Black box testing where we are not making changes in code ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/FreeMASTER/Can-it-be-used-as-Testing-tool-for-Black-box-testing-where-we/m-p/1055592#M212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/vaibhav.bait999@gmail.com"&gt;vaibhav.bait999@gmail.com&lt;/A&gt;‌,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me first clarify the scope of the FreeMASTER tool, to check whether it fits your use-case: FreeMASTER's base functionality consists of monitoring and controlling embedded application variables by manipulating target memory, it does not go as low as simulating hardware inputs/outputs (for this one&amp;nbsp;you'd use a dedicated software such as CAN analyzer).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Can FreeMASTER monitor inputs/outputs ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Yes, in case the embedded application stores those values in dedicated variables. Also, the embedded application should continuously update those values (read inputs, write outputs).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Can FreeMASTER be used without code modifications ?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The only options that does not require code changes is to use a debug probe BDM/JTAG that grants direct access to target memory. In all other options (CAN/LIN/UART) you'd need to embed FreeMASTER driver (library) into the embedded application in order to enable the communication.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iulian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/FreeMASTER/Can-it-be-used-as-Testing-tool-for-Black-box-testing-where-we/m-p/1055592#M212</guid>
      <dc:creator>iulian_stan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T11:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

