<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PE : BitsIo and ByteIo in CodeWarrior for MCU</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/PE-BitsIo-and-ByteIo/m-p/153663#M3818</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="postcolor"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 3;"&gt;Hi.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am writing code with PE on CW4.5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I use bitsIO for Port 8ch, I get warning msg saying that " It is better to use ByteIo instead of BitsIo."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I need to handle each bits used for output, thus I choose BitsIo.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What if I use ByteIo? Still I can handle each IO like BitsIo?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is difference between BitsIo bean and ByteIo? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sebikoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-17T14:42:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PE : BitsIo and ByteIo</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/PE-BitsIo-and-ByteIo/m-p/153663#M3818</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="postcolor"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 3;"&gt;Hi.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am writing code with PE on CW4.5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I use bitsIO for Port 8ch, I get warning msg saying that " It is better to use ByteIo instead of BitsIo."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I need to handle each bits used for output, thus I choose BitsIo.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What if I use ByteIo? Still I can handle each IO like BitsIo?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is difference between BitsIo bean and ByteIo? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/PE-BitsIo-and-ByteIo/m-p/153663#M3818</guid>
      <dc:creator>sebikoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-17T14:42:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PE : BitsIo and ByteIo</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/PE-BitsIo-and-ByteIo/m-p/153664#M3819</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ByteIO bean provides the same set of methods like BitsIO bean. You can handle each IO pin by ByteIO bean as well as in BitsIO bean. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Generally if you need to handle a whole port (8-bit input/output) it is recommended to select ByteIO bean instead of BitsIO bean and it is recommended to select the BitsIO bean for utilization as a two- to seven-bit input/output. ByteIO bean has more optimized code of some methods than BitsIO bean when using for whole 8 pin port. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;best regards&lt;BR /&gt;Vojtech Filip&lt;BR /&gt;Processor Expert Support Team&lt;BR /&gt;UNIS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/PE-BitsIo-and-ByteIo/m-p/153664#M3819</guid>
      <dc:creator>ProcessorExpert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-17T22:34:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

