BSR and JSR optimisations ?

markiscarabas — Sat, 13 May 2006 05:53:57 GMT

Hi,

Do you have any clue why this piece of code compiled as is:

#pragma NO_ENTRY
#pragma NO_EXIT
#pragma NO_FRAME
#pragma NO_RETURN
#pragma OPTION ADD "-OnB=b"

static void ISRHandler(void)

{

}

#pragma NO_ENTRY
#pragma NO_EXIT
#pragma NO_FRAME
#pragma NO_RETURN
#pragma OPTION ADD "-OnB=b"

static void rejump_func(void)
{
__asm bsr ISRHandler ; /* vector 63 */
}

Meaning that relative addressing is used as desired.

And in case the ISRHandler goes below rejump_func the "bsr" is changed to "jsr" ?? I need to have my ISRHandler allocated below the rejump table and I need to use relative branch instructions!

Mark

Re: BSR and JSR optimisations ?

CrasyCat — Mon, 15 May 2006 17:37:28 GMT

Hello

According to the HC12 back end documentation,

The "Branch JSR to BSR Optimization" uses a BSR instead of a JSR to call a function, if the offset is small enough and known at compilation time.

When the called function is implemented after the callee, the offset is not known and the HLI assembler is using a JSR (always). You cannot block that from happening.

Currently you have two ways of fixing that:

1- implement the callee after the called function
2- User macro assembler to encode the two functions

I hope this helps.

CrasyCat

topic BSR and JSR optimisations ? in CodeWarrior for MCU

BSR and JSR optimisations ?

Re: BSR and JSR optimisations ?