<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CodeWarrior for MCU中的主题 Re: Compare CodeWarrior with IAR</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/Compare-CodeWarrior-with-IAR/m-p/285580#M10528</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Early versions of CW were less stable. However nowadays I would say stability is about the same for both, it depends what you are doing in there of course. :smileywink:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pavel_sadek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-19T13:00:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compare CodeWarrior with IAR</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/Compare-CodeWarrior-with-IAR/m-p/285579#M10527</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used the IAR EWARM before. And now I want to switch to CW, but when I test it, I find the CW sometimes works, sometimes does not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it true IAR is much more stable than CW?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/Compare-CodeWarrior-with-IAR/m-p/285579#M10527</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielchai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-10T21:05:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compare CodeWarrior with IAR</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/Compare-CodeWarrior-with-IAR/m-p/285580#M10528</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Early versions of CW were less stable. However nowadays I would say stability is about the same for both, it depends what you are doing in there of course. :smileywink:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/CodeWarrior-for-MCU/Compare-CodeWarrior-with-IAR/m-p/285580#M10528</guid>
      <dc:creator>pavel_sadek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-19T13:00:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

