topic Re: CW 5.9.0 SE Inlining functions in Classic/Legacy CodeWarrior

CW 5.9.0 SE Inlining functions

AirDragon — Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:20:07 GMT

I stumbled across the INLINE pragma and managed to get it working, but I 'm still wondering why a simple:

inline void myfunc( void );

wouldn't work?

bigmac — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:42:39 GMT

Hello,

What you have is not correct usage for a pragma. The correct usage -

#pragma INLINE

void myfunc( void)

{

...

}

Regards,

Mac

AirDragon — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:15:29 GMT

Well, yes, that's what was working for me.

But I was asking why just using the inline declarator wouldn't work? I keep getting "missing decl" errors.

bigmac — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:35:11 GMT

Hello,

AirDragon wrote:
But I was asking why just using the inline declarator wouldn't work? I keep getting "missing decl" errors.

Perhaps this is because "inline" is not a valid keyword or typedef.

Regards,

Mac

CrasyCat — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:04:09 GMT

Hello

Compiler delivered on CW 5.9.0 implements the ISO/IEC 9899:1990 (also known as c90 ANSI C standard.

In this standard inline is not a valid keyword for ANSI C language. It is only recognized when you are programming in C++.

CrasyCat

AirDragon — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:54:40 GMT

Huh, ok. That's wierd because I thought I saw the "inline" definition in ISO/IEC 9899... I'll have to look at it again to see whats going on.

Many thanks, bigmac and CrasyCat.

CrasyCat — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:57:56 GMT

Hello

Keyword inline has been added to the ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (also named c99) standard.

But compiler on CW 5.9 does not implement that version of the standard.

CrasyCat

AirDragon — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:13:30 GMT

Well that explains things rather nicely, Lol.

Thanks again.