<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Classic/Legacy CodeWarriorのトピックRe: CodeWarrior Development Tools? Hardly!</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-Development-Tools-Hardly/m-p/123860#M2</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Ahhh, yes. You are absolutly right, however I feel a strong urge to share some of my observations.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pros: Freescale seems to be slightly more open then other vendors, for example I have not seen anybody else give any information about on-chip debugging. They are the ONLY ONES in fact that provide enough info to allow anybody to just make an in-circuit emulator. This is exactly what I did, since I am bent on using apple... If you want to go that route I can e-mail the executable programmer/emulator Apple software and some Claris Works drawings of the interface. I have alo updated the Crossbow assembler to do HC908 code and you can use that. No "C" compiler...&lt;BR /&gt;Cost: free. Software key/protection - none -&amp;gt; you can run it on as many Macs as you please.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cons: You will need to become a really good assembly programmer if you want to go that route. There is quiet a number of better solutions then the Motorola chips. Have a look at the MSP430 where a C crosscompiler goes for 500USD. They have a really good chip, I think... then you could try the PIC, but here again you will need to get a mortgage to buy the software. As for me, I absolutly despise software keys and protections and will go to great lengths to ensure I don't use such products.&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KrisRutecki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-19T00:27:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CodeWarrior Development Tools? Hardly!</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-Development-Tools-Hardly/m-p/123859#M1</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;No so much tools as a pain in the a**!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It has taken two months to upgrade from 3.1 to 4.5. Unbelievable! And even then I had to email practically anybody I could at Freescale!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I would'nt mind so much if they were any good and did'nt require a mortgage to buy.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If a company like Freescale wants to sell processors then it needs to look after the people who&amp;nbsp;develop for &amp;nbsp;them and use their tools.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;There are other 8/16/32 bit processor makers out there. And it's the software developer who decide which one to use!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:24:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-Development-Tools-Hardly/m-p/123859#M1</guid>
      <dc:creator>gpio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-13T07:24:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CodeWarrior Development Tools? Hardly!</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-Development-Tools-Hardly/m-p/123860#M2</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Ahhh, yes. You are absolutly right, however I feel a strong urge to share some of my observations.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pros: Freescale seems to be slightly more open then other vendors, for example I have not seen anybody else give any information about on-chip debugging. They are the ONLY ONES in fact that provide enough info to allow anybody to just make an in-circuit emulator. This is exactly what I did, since I am bent on using apple... If you want to go that route I can e-mail the executable programmer/emulator Apple software and some Claris Works drawings of the interface. I have alo updated the Crossbow assembler to do HC908 code and you can use that. No "C" compiler...&lt;BR /&gt;Cost: free. Software key/protection - none -&amp;gt; you can run it on as many Macs as you please.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cons: You will need to become a really good assembly programmer if you want to go that route. There is quiet a number of better solutions then the Motorola chips. Have a look at the MSP430 where a C crosscompiler goes for 500USD. They have a really good chip, I think... then you could try the PIC, but here again you will need to get a mortgage to buy the software. As for me, I absolutly despise software keys and protections and will go to great lengths to ensure I don't use such products.&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-Development-Tools-Hardly/m-p/123860#M2</guid>
      <dc:creator>KrisRutecki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T00:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

