<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CodeWarrior for 5683xx unstable? in Classic/Legacy CodeWarrior</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-for-5683xx-unstable/m-p/143700#M1591</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've been using version 8.0 of CW for the 565867 processor for about 5 weeks now. During that time I've found three different major code generation bugs. Two of these bugs occur even with no optimization enabled.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is anyone else having similar problems with the code generated by this compiler, or am I the only one?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sglow</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-27T05:37:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CodeWarrior for 5683xx unstable?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-for-5683xx-unstable/m-p/143700#M1591</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've been using version 8.0 of CW for the 565867 processor for about 5 weeks now. During that time I've found three different major code generation bugs. Two of these bugs occur even with no optimization enabled.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is anyone else having similar problems with the code generated by this compiler, or am I the only one?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-for-5683xx-unstable/m-p/143700#M1591</guid>
      <dc:creator>sglow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-27T05:37:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CodeWarrior for 5683xx unstable?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-for-5683xx-unstable/m-p/143701#M1592</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;I have found some compiler bugs too. I think it will be better to log your problems in freescale tracking system. You will receive the answer more quickly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.freescale.com/webapp/ruhp.login.framework" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.freescale.com/webapp/ruhp.login.framework&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:58:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-for-5683xx-unstable/m-p/143701#M1592</guid>
      <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-29T17:58:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CodeWarrior for 5683xx unstable?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-for-5683xx-unstable/m-p/143702#M1593</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Hi Alexey, thanks for the feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, I've been logging service requests for all the bugs, I just wanted to get some feel for how other developers are finding the tools.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/CodeWarrior-for-5683xx-unstable/m-p/143702#M1593</guid>
      <dc:creator>sglow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-30T02:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

