<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Classic/Legacy CodeWarrior中的主题 pmem RAM variable access for DSP56800E</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/pmem-RAM-variable-access-for-DSP56800E/m-p/126152#M155</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Has anyone been successful implementing the "__pmem" type in CW for the 56F8323 etc?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The linker points out that a 16-bit address is inadequate to reach this memory space.&amp;nbsp; However, selecting "large memory" model causes the linker to flag incompatible MSL C library memory model...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;for example, "__pmem unsigned int tbuf[buf_size] ;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;and linker command file including:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;.pRAM:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;{&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;* (.bss.pmem)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;}&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; p.internal_RAM&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;(I am not using PE)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Any help will be much appreciated.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks for listening&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rcf</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-10T05:02:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pmem RAM variable access for DSP56800E</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/pmem-RAM-variable-access-for-DSP56800E/m-p/126152#M155</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Has anyone been successful implementing the "__pmem" type in CW for the 56F8323 etc?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The linker points out that a 16-bit address is inadequate to reach this memory space.&amp;nbsp; However, selecting "large memory" model causes the linker to flag incompatible MSL C library memory model...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;for example, "__pmem unsigned int tbuf[buf_size] ;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;and linker command file including:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;.pRAM:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;{&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;* (.bss.pmem)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;}&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; p.internal_RAM&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;(I am not using PE)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Any help will be much appreciated.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks for listening&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/pmem-RAM-variable-access-for-DSP56800E/m-p/126152#M155</guid>
      <dc:creator>rcf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-10T05:02:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pmem RAM variable access for DSP56800E</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/pmem-RAM-variable-access-for-DSP56800E/m-p/126153#M156</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;update from my original post...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found under "Using MSL for DSP56800E" in online CW help the reference to the "lmm" options of the MSL C and runtime&amp;nbsp; .lib files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now that I have pulled them into the project in the place of the "smm" versions, the linker seems satisfied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this is helpful to anyone else considering using the __pmem option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Classic-Legacy-CodeWarrior/pmem-RAM-variable-access-for-DSP56800E/m-p/126153#M156</guid>
      <dc:creator>rcf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-14T04:01:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

