ColdFire/68K Microcontrollers and ProcessorsのトピックWhich HTTPd is better for M5225X? https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Which-HTTPd-is-better-for-M5225X/m-p/177550#M7057 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>I am trying to complete the existing demo http web servers with necessary features: HTTP basic authentication, POST method and DHCP client. I evaluated MQX demo project, Niche + CMX demo, digibutler projects, FreeRTOS demo, uC/OS-II demo. According to my test result, the MQX demo has the most stable performance. So I hope to use MQX demo as code base, although Digibutler has implemented the authentication part. And I saw the authentication code is implemented in RTCS/MQX. However, the RTCS pdf in MQX is very comprehensive, but not too much on http server.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Does anyone know how to use the RTCS HTTP?&nbsp;</P></BODY></HTML> Sat, 02 May 2009 20:00:22 GMT allankliu 2009-05-02T20:00:22Z Which HTTPd is better for M5225X? https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Which-HTTPd-is-better-for-M5225X/m-p/177550#M7057 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>I am trying to complete the existing demo http web servers with necessary features: HTTP basic authentication, POST method and DHCP client. I evaluated MQX demo project, Niche + CMX demo, digibutler projects, FreeRTOS demo, uC/OS-II demo. According to my test result, the MQX demo has the most stable performance. So I hope to use MQX demo as code base, although Digibutler has implemented the authentication part. And I saw the authentication code is implemented in RTCS/MQX. However, the RTCS pdf in MQX is very comprehensive, but not too much on http server.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Does anyone know how to use the RTCS HTTP?&nbsp;</P></BODY></HTML> Sat, 02 May 2009 20:00:22 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Which-HTTPd-is-better-for-M5225X/m-p/177550#M7057 allankliu 2009-05-02T20:00:22Z Re: Which HTTPd is better for M5225X? https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Which-HTTPd-is-better-for-M5225X/m-p/177551#M7058 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>You may like to also look at the uTasker project (normally a M5225X is running on-line at <A href="http://demo.uTasker.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">demo.uTasker.com</A>). This includes HTTP with post (ARP, RARP, ICMP, IP, UDP, DHCP, DNS, TFTP, TCP, dynamic HTTP, FTP, SMTP, POP3, TELNET, NetBIOS and VLAN), with DHCP and much more...<BR /><A href="http://www.utasker.com/kirin3.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.utasker.com/kirin3.html</A></P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Regards</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Mark</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P></BODY></HTML> Sun, 03 May 2009 03:51:50 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Which-HTTPd-is-better-for-M5225X/m-p/177551#M7058 mjbcswitzerland 2009-05-03T03:51:50Z