<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 54455 and 10BaseT Ethernet in ColdFire/68K Microcontrollers and Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/54455-and-10BaseT-Ethernet/m-p/154782#M4364</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anybody used the M54455 eval board with the standard BSP, in 10BaseT mode? I have one that gets "FEC ENET: rcv is not +last" messages when in 10BaseT (and it doesn't work), but works fine in 100BaseT.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:33:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fslaficionado</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-09T06:33:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>54455 and 10BaseT Ethernet</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/54455-and-10BaseT-Ethernet/m-p/154782#M4364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anybody used the M54455 eval board with the standard BSP, in 10BaseT mode? I have one that gets "FEC ENET: rcv is not +last" messages when in 10BaseT (and it doesn't work), but works fine in 100BaseT.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:33:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/54455-and-10BaseT-Ethernet/m-p/154782#M4364</guid>
      <dc:creator>fslaficionado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-09T06:33:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 54455 and 10BaseT Ethernet</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/54455-and-10BaseT-Ethernet/m-p/154783#M4365</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had the exact same problem with my EVB (error messages connected to 10Mbps ethernet), and found the exact same solution (connect to 100Mbps ethernet).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/54455-and-10BaseT-Ethernet/m-p/154783#M4365</guid>
      <dc:creator>chris82369</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-13T10:07:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 54455 and 10BaseT Ethernet</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/54455-and-10BaseT-Ethernet/m-p/154784#M4366</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;The current Linux Driver and u-boot driver are incapable of running in 10BT mode.&amp;nbsp; The code is incorrect.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There will be a BSP release later with both 100BT and 10BT working.&amp;nbsp; However the messages you are seeing are kernel debug messages saying the buffer has overflowed since the m54455 thinks the 10BT packet was supposed to be 100BT.&amp;nbsp; No hardware modifications are necessary.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Today just live with it.&amp;nbsp; The patch is available to fix fec.c but if you don't need it this month just wait.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/54455-and-10BaseT-Ethernet/m-p/154784#M4366</guid>
      <dc:creator>Embeddedlinux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-28T01:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

