<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ColdFire/68K Microcontrollers and ProcessorsのトピックDifference between MCF5328CVM240 and MCF5328CVM240J</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Difference-between-MCF5328CVM240-and-MCF5328CVM240J/m-p/145577#M3115</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do anybody know the difference between MCF5328CVM240 and MCF5328CVM240J???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my program can run at MCF5328CVM240 but it's fail when I change the processor to MCF5328CVM240J...... GOD!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any different?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PLS help me!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jychen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-30T22:31:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Difference between MCF5328CVM240 and MCF5328CVM240J</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Difference-between-MCF5328CVM240-and-MCF5328CVM240J/m-p/145577#M3115</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do anybody know the difference between MCF5328CVM240 and MCF5328CVM240J???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my program can run at MCF5328CVM240 but it's fail when I change the processor to MCF5328CVM240J...... GOD!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any different?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PLS help me!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Difference-between-MCF5328CVM240-and-MCF5328CVM240J/m-p/145577#M3115</guid>
      <dc:creator>jychen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-30T22:31:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Difference between MCF5328CVM240 and MCF5328CVM240J</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Difference-between-MCF5328CVM240-and-MCF5328CVM240J/m-p/145578#M3116</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Searching Freescale's site for "MCF5328CVM240J﻿" gives a number of hits. This is the one you're looking for:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/shared/doc/pcn/PCN13959.htm?fsrch=1&amp;amp;sr=6" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/shared/doc/pcn/PCN13959.htm?fsrch=1&amp;amp;sr=6&lt;/A&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;New versions of the BGA-packaged product lines and part numbers that are not affected by the ITC Order have been developed.&amp;nbsp; These new versions employ a different package die-attach material in which the characteristic modulus has been substantially modified. These changes to the die-attach material are outlined in Table 1.&amp;nbsp; The remaining bill of materials (BOM) will not change.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So maybe the parts aren't surviving your temperature profile during soldering, whereas the previous ones did. This is unlikely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They've also released a new mask set as detailed here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/shared/doc/pcn/PCN14392.htm?fsrch=1&amp;amp;sr=3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/shared/doc/pcn/PCN14392.htm?fsrch=1&amp;amp;sr=3&lt;/A&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It may be that the MCF5328CVM240 parts you are testing have the old mask set, and MCF5328CVM240J﻿ parts have the new mask set. Check the mask revision level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;The release and implementation of this new maskset is to fix the SDRAM&amp;nbsp;jumping clock&amp;nbsp;issue when executing flexbus accesses.&lt;/FONT&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That corresponds to SECF149 in the Errata.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That shouldn't have changed the bus timing in any significant way. It is unlikely your hardware is relying on the previous strange timing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How about giving more details than "but it's fail"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;HOW&lt;/STRONG&gt; exactly does it fail? What is it doing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Difference-between-MCF5328CVM240-and-MCF5328CVM240J/m-p/145578#M3116</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-01T06:41:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

