<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Benchmark tests for the M5223X in ColdFire/68K Microcontrollers and Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Benchmark-tests-for-the-M5223X/m-p/137202#M1910</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Hello Mark -&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have been following your work on the M52235 with interest, and your document ( &lt;A href="http://www.uTasker.com/docs/uTasker/uTaskerBenchmarks.PDF)" target="test_blank"&gt;http://www.uTasker.com/docs/uTasker/uTaskerBenchmarks.PDF)&lt;/A&gt; makes good reading.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We develop Industrial Terminals and Controllers of various flavours - and at the moment I am doing the final evaluation on the M5223x chip, spesifically around a subset of 802.3 we use in communicationg from the terminals to the Master Controller.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are using Embedded Forth ( SwiftX from Forth Inc) and I would like to replicate your tests using our version of UDP within Forth kernel.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The silly season is upon us, and I will look into this early in the new year.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Let me know if you are interested.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;John Ulyate&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jaux</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-12-14T22:29:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Benchmark tests for the M5223X</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Benchmark-tests-for-the-M5223X/m-p/137201#M1909</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi All&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Using the M52235EVB I have performed 2 benchmark tests using our uTasker project.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The first is to test a low power task which controls the switching of the processor to a stop state whenever this is possible.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The second is a UDP echo test of 512 and 1024 byte packets with a buffer copy in the middle. Then depending on the project configuration, the memory copies are performed using the DMA controller and / or tight loops and calculations are performed in SRAM rather than directly in FLASH. The reaction times were measured for various steps in the process and also the code/SRAM implicatiosn of each solution were monitored.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A draft benchmark report is available at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uTasker.com%2Fdocs%2FuTasker%2FuTaskerBenchmarks.PDF" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.uTasker.com/docs/uTasker/uTaskerBenchmarks.PDF&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would welcome any comments or comparison figures!!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is obvious from the measurements that the algorithm used for the calcualtion of the check sum over the UDP data (when not deactivated) is critical for reaction time. Any ideas??&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mark Butcher&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uTasker.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://www.uTasker.com/uTaskerLogoS.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:47:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Benchmark-tests-for-the-M5223X/m-p/137201#M1909</guid>
      <dc:creator>mjbcswitzerland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-20T01:47:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmark tests for the M5223X</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Benchmark-tests-for-the-M5223X/m-p/137202#M1910</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Hello Mark -&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have been following your work on the M52235 with interest, and your document ( &lt;A href="http://www.uTasker.com/docs/uTasker/uTaskerBenchmarks.PDF)" target="test_blank"&gt;http://www.uTasker.com/docs/uTasker/uTaskerBenchmarks.PDF)&lt;/A&gt; makes good reading.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We develop Industrial Terminals and Controllers of various flavours - and at the moment I am doing the final evaluation on the M5223x chip, spesifically around a subset of 802.3 we use in communicationg from the terminals to the Master Controller.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are using Embedded Forth ( SwiftX from Forth Inc) and I would like to replicate your tests using our version of UDP within Forth kernel.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The silly season is upon us, and I will look into this early in the new year.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Let me know if you are interested.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;John Ulyate&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Benchmark-tests-for-the-M5223X/m-p/137202#M1910</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jaux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-14T22:29:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmark tests for the M5223X</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Benchmark-tests-for-the-M5223X/m-p/137203#M1911</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Hi John&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cool!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tell me once you have something set up. It will be interesting to see how things compare and get ideas about optimsations.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mark&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/ColdFire-68K-Microcontrollers/Benchmark-tests-for-the-M5223X/m-p/137203#M1911</guid>
      <dc:creator>mjbcswitzerland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-14T22:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

