<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Feature Request: Hotsync-like functionality in USBDM v4.x in OSBDM and TBDML</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/OSBDM-and-TBDML/Feature-Request-Hotsync-like-functionality-in-USBDM-v4-x/m-p/190547#M1459</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the explanation, I understand what if feels when someone wants certain feature that does not comply with planned architecture and/or philosophy&amp;nbsp;of the system. Anyway It would be a nice feature if you decide to do so, Thanks !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>carloscuev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-13T10:43:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Feature Request: Hotsync-like functionality in USBDM v4.x</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/OSBDM-and-TBDML/Feature-Request-Hotsync-like-functionality-in-USBDM-v4-x/m-p/190545#M1457</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, sometimes working with USB-MULTLINK-BDM i have found very useful the "Hotsync" functionality, that is not present in current CW 6.3 USBDM Debug DLLs, is there any plans to make something similar? I have not jumped into CW10, does it has this functionality embedded in the new IDE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:20:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/OSBDM-and-TBDML/Feature-Request-Hotsync-like-functionality-in-USBDM-v4-x/m-p/190545#M1457</guid>
      <dc:creator>carloscuev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-11T17:20:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Feature Request: Hotsync-like functionality in USBDM v4.x</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/OSBDM-and-TBDML/Feature-Request-Hotsync-like-functionality-in-USBDM-v4-x/m-p/190546#M1458</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Carloscuev,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have considered this but it there are a few issues:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It conflicts with the strategy USBDM uses to ensure it can connect reliably to "difficult" targets.&amp;nbsp; USBDM holds reset &amp;amp; BKGD low when it detects a rising edge on Vcc (depends on which interface of course).&amp;nbsp; This would conflict with the live connection.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The hardware interface is not powered until connected to the target.&amp;nbsp; It is difficult to prevent the buffers driving the lines during power-up.&amp;nbsp; This would require extra components (diodes?)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The BDM connector is not intended for live connection.&amp;nbsp; There is no way of ensurng the connection sequence for the pins.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some of the above was because I wanted to keep the interface simple as possible.&amp;nbsp; I'll think about it,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;bye.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/OSBDM-and-TBDML/Feature-Request-Hotsync-like-functionality-in-USBDM-v4-x/m-p/190546#M1458</guid>
      <dc:creator>pgo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-12T07:25:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Feature Request: Hotsync-like functionality in USBDM v4.x</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/OSBDM-and-TBDML/Feature-Request-Hotsync-like-functionality-in-USBDM-v4-x/m-p/190547#M1459</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the explanation, I understand what if feels when someone wants certain feature that does not comply with planned architecture and/or philosophy&amp;nbsp;of the system. Anyway It would be a nice feature if you decide to do so, Thanks !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/OSBDM-and-TBDML/Feature-Request-Hotsync-like-functionality-in-USBDM-v4-x/m-p/190547#M1459</guid>
      <dc:creator>carloscuev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-13T10:43:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

