<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32KのトピックRe: FS32K142HRT0MLHT and FS32K142HFT0MLHT use the same hex</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/FS32K142HRT0MLHT-and-FS32K142HFT0MLHT-use-the-same-hex/m-p/1158633#M8272</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Bryant,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;yes, FS32K142H&lt;STRONG&gt;F&lt;/STRONG&gt;T0MLHT can be used as a replacement for FS32K142H&lt;STRONG&gt;R&lt;/STRONG&gt;T0MLHT. No SW changes are required.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 'R' version was 'Basic feature set' and it's no longer offered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 'F' version has CAN FD and FlexIO. So, features Security, ISELED and NFC stack lincese are not available.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:24:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lukaszadrapa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-24T11:24:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FS32K142HRT0MLHT and FS32K142HFT0MLHT use the same hex</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/FS32K142HRT0MLHT-and-FS32K142HFT0MLHT-use-the-same-hex/m-p/1158318#M8262</link>
      <description>Before my company one project use FS32K142HRT0MLHT mcu, other SW team help us development software, and they give me hex file. Now our company substitute FS32K142HFT0MLHT for FS32K142HRT0MLHT, i want to know, Do we need to change hex file. Our project only use FS32K142HRT0MLHT classic CAN and IO function</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/FS32K142HRT0MLHT-and-FS32K142HFT0MLHT-use-the-same-hex/m-p/1158318#M8262</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bryant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-24T05:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FS32K142HRT0MLHT and FS32K142HFT0MLHT use the same hex</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/FS32K142HRT0MLHT-and-FS32K142HFT0MLHT-use-the-same-hex/m-p/1158633#M8272</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Bryant,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;yes, FS32K142H&lt;STRONG&gt;F&lt;/STRONG&gt;T0MLHT can be used as a replacement for FS32K142H&lt;STRONG&gt;R&lt;/STRONG&gt;T0MLHT. No SW changes are required.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 'R' version was 'Basic feature set' and it's no longer offered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 'F' version has CAN FD and FlexIO. So, features Security, ISELED and NFC stack lincese are not available.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:24:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/FS32K142HRT0MLHT-and-FS32K142HFT0MLHT-use-the-same-hex/m-p/1158633#M8272</guid>
      <dc:creator>lukaszadrapa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-24T11:24:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

