<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32KのトピックRe: S32K344 chip, failed to download using bootloader after adding eMCEM_1 module in spd</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-chip-failed-to-download-using-bootloader-after-adding/m-p/2390369#M59678</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/253799"&gt;@XPW&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The problem description is not entirely clear.&lt;BR /&gt;If the application is being programmed through the bootloader, the eMCEM_1 configuration contained in the application should not affect the programming process itself, since the application is not executed during download, it is just a binary.&lt;BR /&gt;Only after the bootloader transfers execution to the application would eMCEM/FCCU-related configuration become relevant, and at that point, it would be useful to check:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;FCCU status registers&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;DCM flags,&amp;nbsp;MC_RGM flags.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Or whether the application actually reaches main()&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on the current description, it is unclear whether the programming operation fails, or whether programming succeeds and the issue occurs later when the application starts executing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you clarify the exact sequence of events?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 11:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>danielmartynek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-03T11:05:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>S32K344 chip, failed to download using bootloader after adding eMCEM_1 module in spd</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-chip-failed-to-download-using-bootloader-after-adding/m-p/2390216#M59673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sort out the logic and rewrite: As the title suggests, when I enabled eMCEM_1 in the app code, downloading the app using the official bootloader failed. If I didn't erase the chip, I couldn't enter the boot again, and even after powering it back on, it wouldn't solve the problem. I suspect that after powering it back on, the boot jumped to the app, but the app didn't run. When I disable eMCEM_1, this issue does not occur. How can I use boot to flash the app when eMCEM_1 is enabled&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:57:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-chip-failed-to-download-using-bootloader-after-adding/m-p/2390216#M59673</guid>
      <dc:creator>XPW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-03T08:57:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32K344 chip, failed to download using bootloader after adding eMCEM_1 module in spd</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-chip-failed-to-download-using-bootloader-after-adding/m-p/2390369#M59678</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/253799"&gt;@XPW&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The problem description is not entirely clear.&lt;BR /&gt;If the application is being programmed through the bootloader, the eMCEM_1 configuration contained in the application should not affect the programming process itself, since the application is not executed during download, it is just a binary.&lt;BR /&gt;Only after the bootloader transfers execution to the application would eMCEM/FCCU-related configuration become relevant, and at that point, it would be useful to check:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;FCCU status registers&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;DCM flags,&amp;nbsp;MC_RGM flags.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Or whether the application actually reaches main()&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on the current description, it is unclear whether the programming operation fails, or whether programming succeeds and the issue occurs later when the application starts executing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you clarify the exact sequence of events?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 11:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-chip-failed-to-download-using-bootloader-after-adding/m-p/2390369#M59678</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielmartynek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-03T11:05:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

