<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MCU Supply Ramp Rate S32K116 in S32K</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2321557#M56957</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the prompt reply.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the reference to the Errata item as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand the applicability to the initial power-up but what criteria to use to decide if this is an initial power up.&amp;nbsp; How low can the supply voltage go before the supply voltage must get close to 0 and rise monotonicly again.&amp;nbsp; Also how close to 0v is required for the next 'initial power-up'?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 01:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>donald3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-24T01:28:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MCU Supply Ramp Rate S32K116</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2321102#M56944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My application is simple automoive body electronics module and I am considering the S32K116.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AN5426 says that MCU supply must ramp monitonicly and if it does not the device may be stuck or damaged.&amp;nbsp; The min and max rampt rates are so wide they are not an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Normally, non monotonic supply can happen for example when turned off and back on or there is bounce in the on/off switch (like in ignition switch in this case).&amp;nbsp; Traditionally we use Brown out reset or LVR to recover this condition but it seems for this part, that is not sufficient.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the device is just fed from a LDO regulator in Automotive application the supply could easilly be non monotonic due to switch bounce on the supply feed etc.&amp;nbsp; What does NXP recomment for power management in very small systems using this processor for Automotive applications?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 05:59:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2321102#M56944</guid>
      <dc:creator>donald3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-23T05:59:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MCU Supply Ramp Rate S32K116</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2321287#M56950</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/150232"&gt;@donald3&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For the S32K1xx devices, the requirement for a &lt;EM&gt;monotonic power‑supply ramp&lt;/EM&gt; in AN5426 refers specifically to the &lt;STRONG&gt;initial power‑up ramp&lt;/STRONG&gt; through the operating thresholds of the internal POR/LVD circuits. This requirement is common to most ARM‑based automotive MCUs and is intended to avoid undefined digital states during startup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A short non‑monotonic event on the battery or ignition line does not damage the device by itself. The risk occurs only if the supply oscillates &lt;STRONG&gt;exactly in the region where the internal analog reset circuitry is transitioning&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and the MCU may fail to exit reset cleanly. This is why AN5426 recommends a monotonic ramp during power‑up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once the device has passed POR and is running, the LVD/BOR modules will correctly trigger a reset when supply dips below their thresholds.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please check the S32K116_0N96V errata, item ERR052092. It recommends using an external regulator capable of supplying the specified voltage with a minimum current of 200 mA.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2321287#M56950</guid>
      <dc:creator>PavelL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-23T13:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MCU Supply Ramp Rate S32K116</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2321557#M56957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the prompt reply.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the reference to the Errata item as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand the applicability to the initial power-up but what criteria to use to decide if this is an initial power up.&amp;nbsp; How low can the supply voltage go before the supply voltage must get close to 0 and rise monotonicly again.&amp;nbsp; Also how close to 0v is required for the next 'initial power-up'?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 01:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2321557#M56957</guid>
      <dc:creator>donald3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-24T01:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MCU Supply Ramp Rate S32K116</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2324329#M57029</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/150232"&gt;@donald3&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I apologize for delayed response caused by vacations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, there's no such a requirement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 10:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/MCU-Supply-Ramp-Rate-S32K116/m-p/2324329#M57029</guid>
      <dc:creator>PavelL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-27T10:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

