<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32K中的主题 Re: DMA MUX</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/DMA-MUX/m-p/2300715#M56367</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/258313"&gt;@siyuanzhengwei&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The example was implemented using a newer RTD version than the one you are currently working with; therefore, changes were introduced to the driver implementation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you are working with RTD 2.0.0, you should refer to the Dma_Ip driver. Starting from RTD 3.0.0, the DMAMux Source configuration was moved to the RM module at the MCAL layer, which explains the difference you are observing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Additionally, we recommend updating to the latest RTD version whenever possible. This helps avoid known issues and ensures you benefit from the most recent fixes, enhancements, and improvements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR, VaneB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 23:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VaneB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-26T23:49:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DMA MUX</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/DMA-MUX/m-p/2300422#M56353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;当前我使用的是，S32 Platform 3.4的编程环境，RTD是2.0.0在我使用DMA过程中我发现，我创建的RM模块中没有Dma Mux,这种情况该如何解决。&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 09:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/DMA-MUX/m-p/2300422#M56353</guid>
      <dc:creator>siyuanzhengwei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T09:47:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DMA MUX</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/DMA-MUX/m-p/2300715#M56367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/258313"&gt;@siyuanzhengwei&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The example was implemented using a newer RTD version than the one you are currently working with; therefore, changes were introduced to the driver implementation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you are working with RTD 2.0.0, you should refer to the Dma_Ip driver. Starting from RTD 3.0.0, the DMAMux Source configuration was moved to the RM module at the MCAL layer, which explains the difference you are observing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Additionally, we recommend updating to the latest RTD version whenever possible. This helps avoid known issues and ensures you benefit from the most recent fixes, enhancements, and improvements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR, VaneB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 23:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/DMA-MUX/m-p/2300715#M56367</guid>
      <dc:creator>VaneB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T23:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DMA MUX</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/DMA-MUX/m-p/2300969#M56381</link>
      <description>感谢你的帮助</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/DMA-MUX/m-p/2300969#M56381</guid>
      <dc:creator>siyuanzhengwei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-27T07:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

