S32KのトピックRe: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

jackhsu — Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:26:12 GMT

Hi Sir,

Good day.

This is IC programmer manufacturer.

Recently we support this MPN(FS32K144HFT0MLHT) with SWD and IAP(boot code).

We face a issue that the content 0x7F is written at address 0x40D, and then programmer read the contents are blank(0xFF) at address 0x400 to 0x7FFFF after power cycle. if we change the content from 0x7F to 0xFF, and the content are correct at whole flash after power cycle. i think whether we have to set up the register in the initialize process and avoid the issue is happened.

Left side is content in software buffer ; Right side is content of chip.

Thank you.

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

danielmartynek — Mon, 01 Jul 2019 09:16:08 GMT

Hi Jack,

Was the 0x400-0x40F phrase erased before the programming?

Why do you program the 0x40D byte to 0x7F?

This is the FOPT byte that is loaded to the Flash Option Register (FOPT) register at reset and the 4-7 bits are reserved.

BR, Daniel

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

jackhsu — Mon, 01 Jul 2019 09:33:58 GMT

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for your reply.

Was the 0x400-0x40F phrase erased before the programming? => Yes, it is eased before the programming.

Why do you program the 0x40D byte to 0x7F? => it is customer's file, we don't know why they need to write 0x7F.

We ever used JLink to program this file as below, and it work well, and we have no idea why the issue is happened on my programming platform.

Need your help to support this case. Thank you.

https://eip.dediprog.com/ftp/download.php?path=dediprog/FS32K.hex

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

danielmartynek — Wed, 03 Jul 2019 11:34:42 GMT

Hi Jack,

You wrote: "... and then programmer reads the contents are blank(0xFF) at address 0x400 to 0x7FFFF after power cycle". If the 0x40C address was 0xFF, the MCU would end up secured and the access to the flash would not be possible without another mass-ease operation. Please see the description of FSEC (36.4.4.1.4 Flash Security Register (FSEC), in the RM. rev10).

I don't have any problem loading the .hex file either using OpenSDA.

What are the programming steps that you are doing?

How do you ease the MCU?

Please refer to AN12130 Production Flash Programming Best Practices for S32K1xx MCUs

Thanks,

BR, Daniel

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

jackhsu — Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:01:44 GMT

Hi Daniel,

Sorry for late reply.

Sorry for making confuse.

if programmer write the 0x7F/0x7D at address 0x40D (flash), the programmer reads the all 0xFF at address 0x400 ~ flash end address after power cycle. if programmer write the 0xFF at address 0x40D (flash), the programmer can read correct content from whole flash.

We use IAP method with SWD during programming, and these is the programming procedure.

Step 1. Power on

Step 2. Read SWD ID

Step 3. Execute erase command via SWD

Step 4. Load IAP code to RAM and booted.

Step 5. Send the data to IAP to write it to chip.

Step 6. Read data from chip to do verify via SWD.

Step 7. Power off

Our engineer even tried to use SWD with no IAP, and the situation is same.

We made the IAP code is refer to IAR sample code.

There is my questions.

1. Do we need to set up the register in the initialize procedure or program procedure?

2. Do we need to set up the register in the IAP code?

3. Or could you help to provide the IAP code and how to communicate it for programming.

Thank you.

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

danielmartynek — Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:06:38 GMT

Hi Jack,

First, could you please be more specific about Step 3?

What command you are using to erase the MCU?

Once the MCU is erased, is the phrase at 0x408 - 0x40F really erased?

I think that the only explanation is that the phrase is not erased.

Thank you,

BR, Daniel

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

jun_chen — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 09:55:25 GMT

Hi Daniel,

I am a colleague of Jack, we are responsible for this case together.

In Step 3, we execute SWD mass erase. When the operation is done 0x40F is 0xFE, others register is 0xFF.

Guess this is the reason why 0x408 - 0x40F can't be programmed.

But currently, we could not execute Erase Sector Command via SWD.

Are we only able to execute Erase Sector Command with boot code in MCU?

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

jackhsu — Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:04:06 GMT

Hi Daniel,

Please help to support this case.

We have to fix the issue quickly because our customer is waiting our solution for production. Thank you.

Re: Programming for FS32K144HFT0MLHT

danielmartynek — Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:28:32 GMT

Hi jackhsu, jun.chen@dediprog.com

As you can see in AN12130, Section 3.2 Erasing flash, during the Mass Erase operations, the flash configuration field is programmed to 0xFE (unsecure). Then, you cannot write the same phrase again without erasing it first.

But you can use all the FTFC commands, including Erase Sector, via SWD by accessing the FTFC registers.

Regards,

Daniel