https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K314/m-p/2051266#M46243 <P>The first batch of chips we used was DC24+, and the software verified a static current of 80uA.<BR />However, after using the DC23+batch of chips, it was found through software verification that the static current exceeded the standard by 100-800uA.<BR />Software verification: Whether all pin configurations of the software are reasonable and meet the requirements of our product design during sleep.<BR />ABA testing was conducted to verify that there is a problem with the DC23+chip, and abnormal phenomena follow DC23+.<BR />The software configuration has been preliminarily checked for issues.<BR />What are the factors causing this? Is there any change involved in the DC23+chip? Is there a possibility of incompatibility? Please help confirm, thank you.</P> Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:09:52 GMT yy12 2025-02-26T03:09:52Z https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K314/m-p/2051266#M46243 <P>The first batch of chips we used was DC24+, and the software verified a static current of 80uA.<BR />However, after using the DC23+batch of chips, it was found through software verification that the static current exceeded the standard by 100-800uA.<BR />Software verification: Whether all pin configurations of the software are reasonable and meet the requirements of our product design during sleep.<BR />ABA testing was conducted to verify that there is a problem with the DC23+chip, and abnormal phenomena follow DC23+.<BR />The software configuration has been preliminarily checked for issues.<BR />What are the factors causing this? Is there any change involved in the DC23+chip? Is there a possibility of incompatibility? Please help confirm, thank you.</P> Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:09:52 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K314/m-p/2051266#M46243 yy12 2025-02-26T03:09:52Z