S32K中的主题 Re: Problems with optimization -Os

Problems with optimization -Os

David_Estevez — Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:53:47 GMT

Hello,

I'm using an S32K116 microcontroller where I run a program that executes a cycle of functions, then it goes into VLPS (Very Low Power Stop) mode, and a 100ms timer wakes it up, and so on consecutively. The problem is that the program works fine if I don't use any compiler optimization. But as soon as I apply -Os optimization, it seems like the cycle speeds up and doesn't respect the 100ms VLPS mode. How can I fix it so that it works with optimization?

Regards,

David

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

davidtosenovjan — Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:35:24 GMT

Do you see some warning messages?

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

David_Estevez — Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:12:37 GMT

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

davidtosenovjan — Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:41:53 GMT

I would test other optimization level, maybe that could give you some clues:

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

David_Estevez — Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:04:02 GMT

Hi again,

As I could see, the problem comes from the FlexCAN. Some CAN interrupt is waking up the microcontroller (uC), but we are neither receiving nor sending any messages. With any optimization, this interrupt that is waking up the uC doesn't appear, but with -Os, it is appearing. I don't know why.

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

David_Estevez — Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:06:12 GMT

Hi again,

I already saw what's happening. The problem is that I send a message via CAN just before going to sleep, and without optimizing the program, it's slower and there's no issue. But when optimizing, it's the transmission complete interrupt that wakes up the VLPS mode. Is there any way to select which types of interrupts are allowed to wake up the VLPS mode? For example, can only the timer be allowed to wake it up?

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

davidtosenovjan — Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:35:46 GMT

I just discussed with colleague having knowledge of low power modes on this device giving me some important notes to this topic:

- FlexCAN can perform wake-up only in Pretended mode that is not available in VLPS

-Alternatively you can use GPIO interrupt on RX pins

- Before entering VLPS, FlexCAN is supposed to be turned off completely.

So the conclusion is that possibly your application is not in VLPS mode because in such case FlexCAN would not work. To prove it, you could measure current consumption or use CLKOUT and measure BUS_CLK frequency.

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

David_Estevez — Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:20:09 GMT

I think I am entering VLPS mode because:

-The consumption drops from 0.74mA to 0.60mA.

-Without enabling the SIRC clock to function in sleep mode, it does not wake up again:

However, it is the CAN interruption that wakes it up. Could it be related to the fact that I am using an external CAN transceiver? My function to enter VLPS mode is as follows:

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

davidtosenovjan — Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:35:24 GMT

that's not a big current drop indeed. If you see DS values, VLPS current are specified in uAmps

How I have already answered, FlexCAN needs to be turned off completely.

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

David_Estevez — Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:13:48 GMT

Hi again,

I have a few questions more.

That is, does the FlexCAN have to be turned off by code? Doesn't it automatically turn off when entering VLPS? Do any other resources need to be disabled before entering VLPS, such as a clock or another peripheral, or does the VLPS mode handle it automatically?

And regarding the function I sent you, is it correct? I wrote it exactly as stated in the RM manual, but I’m not sure if I’m missing anything else.

Re: Problems with optimization -Os

davidtosenovjan — Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:11:40 GMT

It is described in RM, section 55.1.9.