<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32Kのトピックmapping code instruction in RAM S32K3</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/mapping-code-instruction-in-RAM-S32K3/m-p/2026776#M45047</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good morning,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have some doubts about running specific portions of code in RAM. In particular i would like to map routines related to the ADC,ICU ecc... in RAM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I started from the following example(taken from MCSPTE1AK344 devkits):MCSPTE1AK344_PMSM_FOC_2sh_II project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, I have two questions regarding this example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1)In the various .h files(ADC_MemMap.h ecc..) the LINARO_C_S32K3XX_option is selected to map the code in itcm ram. Why was this possibility selected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2)In the same project, i noticed that 2 different Adc_MemMap.h are included. one directly in the project folder under rtd_customized, the other instead in the default path: C:\NXP\S32DS.3.5\S32DS\software\PlatformSDK_S32K3\RTD\BaseNXP_TS_T40D34M30I0R0\include&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that the Adc_MemMap.h is used under rtd_customized which has&amp;nbsp;#pragma GCC section text ".itcm_text"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While default Adc_MemMap.h file had&amp;nbsp;#pragma GCC section text ".mcal_text".&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why was it decided to map the code of these RTD(ADC, ecc...) into the itcm_text instead of using the default file which involved mapping the code into mcal_text?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any help/support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>michelet1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-13T13:27:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>mapping code instruction in RAM S32K3</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/mapping-code-instruction-in-RAM-S32K3/m-p/2026776#M45047</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good morning,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have some doubts about running specific portions of code in RAM. In particular i would like to map routines related to the ADC,ICU ecc... in RAM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I started from the following example(taken from MCSPTE1AK344 devkits):MCSPTE1AK344_PMSM_FOC_2sh_II project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, I have two questions regarding this example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1)In the various .h files(ADC_MemMap.h ecc..) the LINARO_C_S32K3XX_option is selected to map the code in itcm ram. Why was this possibility selected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2)In the same project, i noticed that 2 different Adc_MemMap.h are included. one directly in the project folder under rtd_customized, the other instead in the default path: C:\NXP\S32DS.3.5\S32DS\software\PlatformSDK_S32K3\RTD\BaseNXP_TS_T40D34M30I0R0\include&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that the Adc_MemMap.h is used under rtd_customized which has&amp;nbsp;#pragma GCC section text ".itcm_text"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While default Adc_MemMap.h file had&amp;nbsp;#pragma GCC section text ".mcal_text".&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why was it decided to map the code of these RTD(ADC, ecc...) into the itcm_text instead of using the default file which involved mapping the code into mcal_text?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any help/support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/mapping-code-instruction-in-RAM-S32K3/m-p/2026776#M45047</guid>
      <dc:creator>michelet1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-13T13:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

