<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: s32k312 schM caused delay in S32K</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k312-schM-caused-delay/m-p/2023011#M44833</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well, that could be the case. Execution timing of functions are present in quality package.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In my application, that 1.5+ μs delay can not be tolerated，so how to improve schM speed ? or disable schM?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This solely depends on the method you are using. Not sure what means enter/exit, also if you used direct write to SIUL2 register to toggle pin or again you used RTD.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suggest to exclude RTD functions when you measuring pin toggle as it will only add another delay.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can also use trace function of debugger to see execution times of instructions/task...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But, with only using RTD, yes that delay is possible.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 06:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-07T06:43:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>s32k312 schM caused delay</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k312-schM-caused-delay/m-p/2022859#M44829</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using s32k312 with RTD5.0.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found out that :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with schM_Enter/Exit Area,&amp;nbsp; toggle pin 's frequency is 300KHz;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;without schM_Enter/Exit Area,&amp;nbsp; toggle pin 's frequency is 3MHz.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my application, that 1.5+&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;μs&lt;/SPAN&gt; delay can not be&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;tolerated，so how to improve schM speed ? or disable schM?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Vandarkholme_0-1736213160067.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/318294iB1126510527E4A7D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Vandarkholme_0-1736213160067.png" alt="Vandarkholme_0-1736213160067.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Vandarkholme_1-1736213941511.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/318296i4455AEFC91FCFB3C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Vandarkholme_1-1736213941511.png" alt="Vandarkholme_1-1736213941511.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Vandarkholme_2-1736213962357.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/318297i48EFD90E0DC33CE7/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Vandarkholme_2-1736213962357.png" alt="Vandarkholme_2-1736213962357.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 01:46:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k312-schM-caused-delay/m-p/2022859#M44829</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vandarkholme</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-07T01:46:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: s32k312 schM caused delay</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k312-schM-caused-delay/m-p/2023011#M44833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well, that could be the case. Execution timing of functions are present in quality package.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In my application, that 1.5+ μs delay can not be tolerated，so how to improve schM speed ? or disable schM?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This solely depends on the method you are using. Not sure what means enter/exit, also if you used direct write to SIUL2 register to toggle pin or again you used RTD.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suggest to exclude RTD functions when you measuring pin toggle as it will only add another delay.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can also use trace function of debugger to see execution times of instructions/task...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But, with only using RTD, yes that delay is possible.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 06:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k312-schM-caused-delay/m-p/2023011#M44833</guid>
      <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-07T06:43:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

