<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32KのトピックRe: S32K358 LockStep Core1</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K358-LockStep-Core1/m-p/1946637#M40509</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When configured for lockstep, the cores will be configured to run in lockstep before being released from reset. Hence the Core1 registers have no effect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bryan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 21:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bryan_brauchler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-03T21:26:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>S32K358 LockStep Core1</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K358-LockStep-Core1/m-p/1944683#M40416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using a&amp;nbsp;S32K3X8EVB-Q289 devkit board and have a question regarding lockstep (which is enabled):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Lockstep core0's PRTN0_CORE0_STAT register shows that its clock is active.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Lockstep core1's PRTN0_CORE1_STAT register shows that its clock is inactive.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wondering if the lockstep's 2nd core needs to be explicitly configured to run i.e. enable its clock? Or, the fact that lockstep is enabled,&amp;nbsp; the contents of locktstep core1's PRTN0_CORE1_STAT register is not valid?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 19:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K358-LockStep-Core1/m-p/1944683#M40416</guid>
      <dc:creator>darknite2023</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-30T19:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32K358 LockStep Core1</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K358-LockStep-Core1/m-p/1946637#M40509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When configured for lockstep, the cores will be configured to run in lockstep before being released from reset. Hence the Core1 registers have no effect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bryan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 21:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K358-LockStep-Core1/m-p/1946637#M40509</guid>
      <dc:creator>bryan_brauchler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-03T21:26:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32K358 LockStep Core1</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K358-LockStep-Core1/m-p/1946666#M40512</link>
      <description>Hi Bryan. Thanks for the response and clarifying my doubt. As a suggestion, it would be nice to state this in the PRTN section of the S32K3XX RM.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 22:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K358-LockStep-Core1/m-p/1946666#M40512</guid>
      <dc:creator>darknite2023</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-03T22:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

