<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32K中的主题 S32k clock tolerance</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32k-clock-tolerance/m-p/843255#M3418</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using the s32k144 evalboard. I am suing the fast internal clock:FIRC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I generated a PWM signal based on FIRC, which is supposed to be 16 Mhz, however it is only 15.6. This gives me more than 2.5 % difference/tolerance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/S32K-DS.pdf" title="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/S32K-DS.pdf"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/S32K-DS.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table 19.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Fast internal RC Oscillator electrical specifications&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There should be only 1%. How comes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>momo12</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-23T12:33:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>S32k clock tolerance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32k-clock-tolerance/m-p/843255#M3418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using the s32k144 evalboard. I am suing the fast internal clock:FIRC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I generated a PWM signal based on FIRC, which is supposed to be 16 Mhz, however it is only 15.6. This gives me more than 2.5 % difference/tolerance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/S32K-DS.pdf" title="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/S32K-DS.pdf"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/S32K-DS.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table 19.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Fast internal RC Oscillator electrical specifications&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There should be only 1%. How comes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32k-clock-tolerance/m-p/843255#M3418</guid>
      <dc:creator>momo12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-23T12:33:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32k clock tolerance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32k-clock-tolerance/m-p/843256#M3419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It can be a measurement error. I recommend you set PWM with a long period and for example with 50% duty cycle and many pulses. Then do the measurement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32k-clock-tolerance/m-p/843256#M3419</guid>
      <dc:creator>dianabatrlova</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-25T08:30:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

