<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: s32k144 in S32K</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k144/m-p/1820536#M32426</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not aware of such restriction within HW. Are you referring to some driver?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR, Petr&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PetrS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-04T12:17:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>s32k144</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k144/m-p/1818195#M32277</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi，everyone，Some of my friends told me that&amp;nbsp; when S32k144 configure CAN0 to CANFD mode ，I can't configure&amp;nbsp; CAN1 and CAN2 as Normal CAN 2.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't find proof in RM，so I come here to ask you guys .thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k144/m-p/1818195#M32277</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottXing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-29T02:06:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: s32k144</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k144/m-p/1820536#M32426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not aware of such restriction within HW. Are you referring to some driver?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR, Petr&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/s32k144/m-p/1820536#M32426</guid>
      <dc:creator>PetrS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-04T12:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

