<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issue with TP Layer Integration on S32k118 in S32K</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1673866#M24267</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Bryan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes this function gets called on second transmission as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shruti_JSS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-21T18:01:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issue with TP Layer Integration on S32k118</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1672970#M24210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am facing an issue with the length of the received buffer. I noticed that the length of the last received message will not be updated with the recently received message. On further analysis, I also found that it is triggered from the TP layer “lin_commontl_proto.c” file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The attached image is the code snippet where I found the issue arise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Tina123_1-1687287443167.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/228606iC8761895C2D8D756/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Tina123_1-1687287443167.png" alt="Tina123_1-1687287443167.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I transmitted a Read DID where the DLC is 3 and then transmitted a Write DID of length 19, I was having issues with my application. Seemed that the value of *length was 3 and temp_length was 19 which led to problem with my application.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to understand if I am going wrong somewhere with the way I use the data or does this file need to be updated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:58:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1672970#M24210</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shruti_JSS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-20T18:58:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with TP Layer Integration on S32k118</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1673016#M24211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The length pointer should be set by ld_receive_message&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bryan_brauchler_0-1687293931605.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/228616i6295DC09547F4FE5/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bryan_brauchler_0-1687293931605.png" alt="bryan_brauchler_0-1687293931605.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this getting called on the second transmission?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bryan&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 20:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1673016#M24211</guid>
      <dc:creator>bryan_brauchler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-20T20:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with TP Layer Integration on S32k118</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1673866#M24267</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Bryan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes this function gets called on second transmission as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1673866#M24267</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shruti_JSS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-21T18:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with TP Layer Integration on S32k118</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1675092#M24323</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are investigating. Would you be able to provide a minimal example code that demonstrates this issue?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bryan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1675092#M24323</guid>
      <dc:creator>bryan_brauchler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-23T18:43:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue with TP Layer Integration on S32k118</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1675846#M24373</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;as Bryan wrote please provide more info. SW stack team is requestion&amp;nbsp;some information as below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Hardware and software version that they are using.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;How can I reproduce this issue?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Trace log or images of the frames that were transmitted on the bus.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;BR, Petr&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/Issue-with-TP-Layer-Integration-on-S32k118/m-p/1675846#M24373</guid>
      <dc:creator>PetrS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-26T08:42:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

