<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPCF problem in S32K</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/IPCF-problem/m-p/1664224#M23670</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="chuanlin_0-1686045667496.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/226415i56275FF33CFEEAAC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="chuanlin_0-1686045667496.png" alt="chuanlin_0-1686045667496.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,If implementing IPCF Core0-&amp;gt;Core1 and Core1-&amp;gt;Core0 information exchange, does this configuration item need to add two Unmanaged Channels?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chuanlin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-06T10:02:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPCF problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/IPCF-problem/m-p/1664224#M23670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="chuanlin_0-1686045667496.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/226415i56275FF33CFEEAAC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="chuanlin_0-1686045667496.png" alt="chuanlin_0-1686045667496.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,If implementing IPCF Core0-&amp;gt;Core1 and Core1-&amp;gt;Core0 information exchange, does this configuration item need to add two Unmanaged Channels?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/IPCF-problem/m-p/1664224#M23670</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuanlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-06T10:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPCF problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/IPCF-problem/m-p/1668104#M23869</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/210290"&gt;@chuanlin&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, the channels on each core is independence, but need to be configure symmetrically. (If on core 1 you have (unmanaged, managed, managed) then core 0 also need the same channel with same order (unmanaged, managed, managed), pools number, pool size.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Incase of using Unmanaged, each core will use it own unmanaged channel to communicate with the other core.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-WRAPPER&gt;&lt;/LI-WRAPPER&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/IPCF-problem/m-p/1668104#M23869</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanNguyenDuy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-13T07:53:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

