<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32KのトピックRe: S32K344 BGA - RMII + QSPI</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-BGA-RMII-QSPI/m-p/1489542#M16369</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, it is the same as it is not related to the package. You have tab in the "S32K344_IOMUX.xlsx" excel sheet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png" style="width: 720px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/186660i25991315DE12CC5C/image-dimensions/720x434?v=v2" width="720" height="434" role="button" title="davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png" alt="davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>davidtosenovjan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-14T14:07:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>S32K344 BGA - RMII + QSPI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-BGA-RMII-QSPI/m-p/1488090#M16314</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are interested in using both RMII and QuadSPI interfaces at the same time on S32K344 in BGA package. Similar question was already posted here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-RMII-QSPI/td-p/1416828" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-RMII-QSPI/td-p/1416828&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The difference is that topic was about S32K344 in MaxQFP172 package. Does the same apply for the S32K344 in BGA257 package?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are enough dedicated pins to route both RMII and QSPI, but we wanted to double check because of the "Pad type" for those pins in "S32K344_IOMUX.xlsx"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We were thinking about using one of the two configurations below. Green cell indicates the pin was used to route the signal on the left side. There is also a "Pad Type" column which corresponds to the pin in green. The red cell indicate the pin is used for something else (QSPI in this case).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Option A (the same pinout as in the&amp;nbsp;S32K3X4EVB-Q257):&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="matej_15_0-1657624237273.png" style="width: 521px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/186325iF3CE52B8A67104B5/image-dimensions/521x311?v=v2" width="521" height="311" role="button" title="matej_15_0-1657624237273.png" alt="matej_15_0-1657624237273.png" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;matej_15_0-1657624237273.png&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Option B:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="matej_15_1-1657624573202.png" style="width: 509px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/186331i482C0FED73685FB4/image-dimensions/509x304?v=v2" width="509" height="304" role="button" title="matej_15_1-1657624573202.png" alt="matej_15_1-1657624573202.png" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;matej_15_1-1657624573202.png&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use one of these two configurations in order to have both RMII and QSPI functionalities&amp;nbsp;at the same time? Is pad type fast enough for RMII use?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, there is a "S32K34x_Ethernet Use cases" tab in the&amp;nbsp;"S32K344_IOMUX.xlsx" table which only mentions MII+QSPI, there is nothing about RMII+QSPI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matej&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-BGA-RMII-QSPI/m-p/1488090#M16314</guid>
      <dc:creator>matej_15</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-12T11:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32K344 BGA - RMII + QSPI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-BGA-RMII-QSPI/m-p/1489542#M16369</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, it is the same as it is not related to the package. You have tab in the "S32K344_IOMUX.xlsx" excel sheet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png" style="width: 720px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/186660i25991315DE12CC5C/image-dimensions/720x434?v=v2" width="720" height="434" role="button" title="davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png" alt="davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;davidtosenovjan_1-1657807608089.png&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K344-BGA-RMII-QSPI/m-p/1489542#M16369</guid>
      <dc:creator>davidtosenovjan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-14T14:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

