<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic [S32K118] Use the same ISR for multiple interrupt sources in S32K</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K118-Use-the-same-ISR-for-multiple-interrupt-sources/m-p/1272901#M10795</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I want to ask if its possible to use the same ISR for various interrupts sources, as I want to implement a "OS like" function that handles all the interrupts and jumps into the corresponding user ISR performing different privilege/stack adjustments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont know if this is possible and if there is a way to know the specific interrupt source that caused the interrupt inside the same function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!! All comments would be appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 09:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>riglesias2021</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-06T09:13:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>[S32K118] Use the same ISR for multiple interrupt sources</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K118-Use-the-same-ISR-for-multiple-interrupt-sources/m-p/1272901#M10795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I want to ask if its possible to use the same ISR for various interrupts sources, as I want to implement a "OS like" function that handles all the interrupts and jumps into the corresponding user ISR performing different privilege/stack adjustments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont know if this is possible and if there is a way to know the specific interrupt source that caused the interrupt inside the same function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!! All comments would be appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 09:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K118-Use-the-same-ISR-for-multiple-interrupt-sources/m-p/1272901#M10795</guid>
      <dc:creator>riglesias2021</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-06T09:13:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [S32K118] Use the same ISR for multiple interrupt sources</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K118-Use-the-same-ISR-for-multiple-interrupt-sources/m-p/1273630#M10811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this sounds like deferred interrupt processing which is common practice. Interrupts are handled as usual but the handlers only record cause of interrupt and clear interrupt. Main function/task then can handle the events as required. Would this fit your needs?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2021 09:56:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32K/S32K118-Use-the-same-ISR-for-multiple-interrupt-sources/m-p/1273630#M10811</guid>
      <dc:creator>lukaszadrapa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-07T09:56:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

