<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32GのトピックRe: S32G3 PFE: egress Change via libfci_cli Not Reflected in Linux Network Interface Traffic Path</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2322470#M16050</link>
    <description>BSP46.0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/auto_yocto_bsp" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/auto_yocto_bsp&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>minJ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-25T10:20:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>S32G3 PFE: egress Change via libfci_cli Not Reflected in Linux Network Interface Traffic Path</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2322294#M16045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;[Question Summary]&lt;BR /&gt;On the S32G3 board, I attempted to change the egress of emac0 from hif0 to hif1 using the following command:&lt;BR /&gt;libfci_cli logif-update -i emac0 --egress hif1&lt;BR /&gt;However, the actual traffic path does not behave as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;root@s32g399ardb3:~# libfci_cli phyif-print -i emac0&lt;BR /&gt;DISCLAIMER: T[ 2243.924784] pfeng 46000000.pfe: emac0: Unable to get MAC address: 2&lt;BR /&gt;his[ 2243.931384] pfeng 46000000.pfe: emac0: Unable to get MAC address: 2&lt;BR /&gt;is a DEMO application. It is not part of the production code deliverables.&lt;BR /&gt;0: emac0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;ENABLED&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;promisc:OFF, mode:DEFAULT, block-state:NORMAL&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;vlan-conf:OFF, ptp-conf:OFF, ptp-promisc:OFF, q-in-q:ON&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;discard-if-ttl-below-2:OFF, fast-forward-all-tcp:ON&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ingress: 151 egress: 54 discarded: 0 malformed: 0&lt;BR /&gt;flexible-filter: ---&lt;BR /&gt;ptp-mgmt-if: ---&lt;BR /&gt;MAC:&lt;BR /&gt;00:04:9f:be:ef:00&lt;BR /&gt;33:33:00:00:00:01&lt;BR /&gt;01:00:5e:00:00:01&lt;BR /&gt;33:33:ff:be:ef:00&lt;BR /&gt;01:80:c2:00:00:00&lt;BR /&gt;01:80:c2:00:00:03&lt;BR /&gt;01:80:c2:00:00:0e&lt;BR /&gt;mirrors:&lt;BR /&gt;rxmirr0: ---&lt;BR /&gt;rxmirr1: ---&lt;BR /&gt;txmirr0: ---&lt;BR /&gt;txmirr1: ---&lt;BR /&gt;logical interfaces:&lt;BR /&gt;0: emac0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;ENABLED&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;promisc:ON, match-mode:AND, discard-on-match:OFF&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;accepted: 151 rejected: 0 discarded: 0 processed: 151&lt;BR /&gt;egress: hif1&lt;BR /&gt;match-rules: ---&lt;BR /&gt;Command successfully executed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Detailed Situation]&lt;BR /&gt;In the device tree (dts), each Linux network interface (pfe0, pfe1, pfe2, etc.) is statically mapped using the nxp,pfeng-hif-channels and nxp,pfeng-linked-phyif properties as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;pfe0: hif0 (0), emac0 (0)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;pfe1: hif1 (1), emac1 (1)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;pfe2: hif2 (2), emac2 (2)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;After running&lt;BR /&gt;libfci_cli logif-update -i emac0 --egress hif1&lt;BR /&gt;to change the egress of emac0 to hif1,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Expectation:&lt;BR /&gt;Traffic entering emac0 should be forwarded to hif1 (and thus appear on pfe1).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reality:&lt;BR /&gt;No traffic appears on the pfe1 interface (tested with ping, raw socket, etc.).&lt;BR /&gt;Only the originally mapped interfaces (pfe0, pfe2, etc.) work as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Questions]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Why does changing the egress with libfci_cli logif-update -i emac0 --egress hif1 not result in traffic being delivered to the corresponding Linux network interface (e.g., pfe1)?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Does the egress setting take precedence for the actual traffic path, or is the device tree mapping always prioritized?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What additional configuration or steps are required to dynamically change the traffic path by modifying the egress as intended?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 06:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2322294#M16045</guid>
      <dc:creator>minJ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-25T06:18:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32G3 PFE: egress Change via libfci_cli Not Reflected in Linux Network Interface Traffic Path</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2322452#M16049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/260071"&gt;@minJ&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the post.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will check it soon, may I know which version BSP you are working with?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chenyin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:48:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2322452#M16049</guid>
      <dc:creator>chenyin_h</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-25T09:48:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32G3 PFE: egress Change via libfci_cli Not Reflected in Linux Network Interface Traffic Path</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2322470#M16050</link>
      <description>BSP46.0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/auto_yocto_bsp" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/auto_yocto_bsp&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2322470#M16050</guid>
      <dc:creator>minJ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-25T10:20:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32G3 PFE: egress Change via libfci_cli Not Reflected in Linux Network Interface Traffic Path</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2323572#M16058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/260071"&gt;@minJ&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, currently dynamically updating the bindings(emac, hif) during run-time is not supported in Linux PFE drivers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chenyin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:02:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2323572#M16058</guid>
      <dc:creator>chenyin_h</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-26T11:02:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S32G3 PFE: egress Change via libfci_cli Not Reflected in Linux Network Interface Traffic Path</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2332621#M16119</link>
      <description>Thank you for your response.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32G/S32G3-PFE-egress-Change-via-libfci-cli-Not-Reflected-in-Linux/m-p/2332621#M16119</guid>
      <dc:creator>minJ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-13T11:37:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

