<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Power ManagementのトピックIs TEA1792 suitable for three-phase rectifier?</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/Is-TEA1792-suitable-for-three-phase-rectifier/m-p/994989#M715</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am using TEA1792, a synchronous rectifier controller, as the controller for MOSFET in a three-phase rectifier. The simplified schematic is as illustrated:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="TEA1792整流图.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/92425i6DA14BCF916D9A71/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="TEA1792整流图.png" alt="TEA1792整流图.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The schematic of the two right-most TEA1792s is shown below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="TEA1792整流原理图-部分.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/92426i85F4D4AFC2706B08/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="TEA1792整流原理图-部分.png" alt="TEA1792整流原理图-部分.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The MOSFETs&amp;nbsp;are used here to substitute for the traditional diodes. The conceived benefit of the replacement is to reduce the voltage drop through the diode and thus the power&amp;nbsp;loss.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, the results of the actual tests are&amp;nbsp;confusing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. If C32 and C39 are removed, Q2 will never be switched on, and Q1 will be switched on simetimes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. If C32 and C39 are&amp;nbsp;connected, Q2 and Q1 will be switched on most of the time. But during a small portion of time(see&amp;nbsp;2.8 ms), Q2 and Q1 are not switched on, although the voltage drop is -0.8V.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. I want to see if a constant direct current will force U14 to switch Q2 on. So I did a test. First,&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;C39 was removed. Second,&amp;nbsp;direct current(10A) from GND to phase C&amp;nbsp;was conducted. Then I noticed that Q2 was not switched on. The voltage of phase C&amp;nbsp;was around -0.8V. This means that although TEA1792 senses that the voltage drop is below -220mV, it still cannot switch Q2 on.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Other parameters are posted here: the frequency of the three-phase voltages is 400Hz. The voltage of the load is 40V.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Could you&amp;nbsp;help me figure out whether&amp;nbsp;TEA1792 is suitable for three-phase rectifier or direct current? Thanks a lot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yuxiangxyz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-15T02:59:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is TEA1792 suitable for three-phase rectifier?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/Is-TEA1792-suitable-for-three-phase-rectifier/m-p/994989#M715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am using TEA1792, a synchronous rectifier controller, as the controller for MOSFET in a three-phase rectifier. The simplified schematic is as illustrated:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="TEA1792整流图.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/92425i6DA14BCF916D9A71/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="TEA1792整流图.png" alt="TEA1792整流图.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The schematic of the two right-most TEA1792s is shown below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="TEA1792整流原理图-部分.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/92426i85F4D4AFC2706B08/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="TEA1792整流原理图-部分.png" alt="TEA1792整流原理图-部分.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The MOSFETs&amp;nbsp;are used here to substitute for the traditional diodes. The conceived benefit of the replacement is to reduce the voltage drop through the diode and thus the power&amp;nbsp;loss.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, the results of the actual tests are&amp;nbsp;confusing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. If C32 and C39 are removed, Q2 will never be switched on, and Q1 will be switched on simetimes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. If C32 and C39 are&amp;nbsp;connected, Q2 and Q1 will be switched on most of the time. But during a small portion of time(see&amp;nbsp;2.8 ms), Q2 and Q1 are not switched on, although the voltage drop is -0.8V.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. I want to see if a constant direct current will force U14 to switch Q2 on. So I did a test. First,&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;C39 was removed. Second,&amp;nbsp;direct current(10A) from GND to phase C&amp;nbsp;was conducted. Then I noticed that Q2 was not switched on. The voltage of phase C&amp;nbsp;was around -0.8V. This means that although TEA1792 senses that the voltage drop is below -220mV, it still cannot switch Q2 on.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Other parameters are posted here: the frequency of the three-phase voltages is 400Hz. The voltage of the load is 40V.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Could you&amp;nbsp;help me figure out whether&amp;nbsp;TEA1792 is suitable for three-phase rectifier or direct current? Thanks a lot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/Is-TEA1792-suitable-for-three-phase-rectifier/m-p/994989#M715</guid>
      <dc:creator>yuxiangxyz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-15T02:59:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is TEA1792 suitable for three-phase rectifier?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/Is-TEA1792-suitable-for-three-phase-rectifier/m-p/994990#M716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's your OUT+ signal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you please test the waveforms of Vsrsense/Vdriver?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:39:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/Is-TEA1792-suitable-for-three-phase-rectifier/m-p/994990#M716</guid>
      <dc:creator>guoweisun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-22T01:39:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

